Đe
machine-minded Superclass that desires an antiChristian one world government is
unnerved by financial competitors:
While major media speak
of the recent spate of riots throughout the Islamic world as “spontaneous,” the
financing of these “opposition” movements by major banks over the last decade
says otherwise. But why? The rise of Islamic banking as a challenge to the
Rothschild empire serves as a clear financial reason why the present
governments in the Islamic world must go.
. . .
The
groups involved in financing the opposition in Egypt and elsewhere include,
most commonly, the George Soros’ Open Society Institute, the International
Crisis Group (ICG) of the Rothschild family and their many offshoots. Major
figures sitting on ICG’s board include George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
former Senator George Mitchell, Morton Abramowitz, Gen. Wesley Clark and Samuel
Berger. They have donated millions of dollars to liberal groups operating
against governments in strategic areas. The agenda is identical in each case:
liberal democracy, secularism, feminism, and private banking. The mobilization
of urban youth has long been an important aspect of Soros/ICG operations from Belarus to Bahrain.
. . .
The
creation of political opposition is only part of the story. These
organizations, according to news sources such as the British Daily Telegraph
and the Global Islamic Finance News, have been involved in training
teachers, judges, police officers and bureaucrats in North
Africa and elsewhere. The ICG and others are attempting to create
a society that is no longer Islamic, no longer religions or traditional, but
liberal, urban and open to foreign investment and banking. Given the interests
of the players involved, the central concept is to ensure the presence of
Rothschild banking in areas where it is being challenged both by the state and
independent Islamic banking.
The
European Union is in a slow state of decomposition. Riots from Greece to Iceland have shown the bankruptcy
of major European banks. On the other hand, Islamic banking operates with a
total deposit base of over $1.5 trillion. In 2010, the British Daily
Telegraph reported that the Islamic finance movement was challenging London for financial dominance through their investments
in Bahrain, Egypt and Tunisia,
using Tunis
specifically as its new base. Back in 2008, the Washington Post wrote,
“As big Western financial institutions have teetered one after the other in the
crisis of recent weeks, another financial sector is gaining new confidence:
Islamic banking.” The thrust of the article is that Islamic banks are more
stable than Western banks, partially because of the refusal to charge interest
or take excessive risks. This Post article sent warning signs to London, and the ICG
stepped up its financing efforts in Islamic states in response.
The
Telegraph admitted that the new Islamic banks were doing some damage to London’s banking profits.
At a time when the banking industry struggles with debt, a major challenger
such as the Tunis
movement could do some grave harm.
. . .
The
removal of non-liberal states means the ability for Western banks to more
easily penetrate places like Libya,
that has a government controlled central bank. Strong states in this strategic
part of the world make it far more difficult for Rothschild banks to control
finance in these states, and as a result, the “opposition” is created as a
financial investment.
Source: Fr
Matthew Raphael Johnson, ‘Who’s Behind the Arab Revolutions?’, The Barnes Review, May/June 2011, http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110822/who%E2%80%99s-behind-the-arab-revolutions,
posted 22 Aug. 2011, accessed 19 March 2015
It
must then be an area they view of critical importance for control over peoples,
theods, nations.
What
better reason therefore to begin local banking that is sundered from their
control grid? We have heard much of the
‘petro-dollar’ of the American Empire and the stranglehold it has allowed the
‘Most Christian Country’ to keep on others around the world. Why not counter it with something like a
‘tilth-dollar’, as Robert Swann describes in ‘Appropriate Currency’ just
below?
There
is quite a lot that is praiseworthy in his essay. Yet we disagree with him on the need for a
‘world economy’; some hurdles probably need to be left in place as a way to forestall
the rise of Antichrist/One World Government and as a way to protect local
cultures from being fornaughten by an outside, warsome culture (like the
materialistic consumer culture of the secular Puritan New England States that
has conquered the Souð, Western Europe, and the ‘westernized’ portions of Asia,
the Middle East, and so on). Withal, his
words ought to be read:
It
is up to the advocates of appropriate technology and small-scale systems to
become the inventors of an appropriate technology for money. This task is vital
to us, because all of the other appropriate technologies with which we are
involved eventually depend upon a proper and decent exchange system. When
national currencies fail because of runaway inflation, or for any other reason,
we will survive in some fashion by using barter or labor exchange systems.
If
we are to expand and grow, and become more than a counter culture movement or a
New Age subset of the larger culture, then we must create a new money system to
replace the present system. Through this new system, the attributes we
value-cooperation, self-reliance, community-can become growing and dominant
within the entire culture. This is [the] direction our work needs to go, not
only [to] survive the coming currency collapse, but also to develop what
Schumacher called an "economy of permanence."
. . .
Two
important questions follow from that. The first is, what commodity has a
universal measure of value in today's world? I would suggest that it's energy,
and that we consider using some form of energy as the unit of measurement and
as the reserve currency for redemption purposes. The so-called energy crisis
has made it clear to almost everyone that energy is the key factor in all forms
of production, and in meeting the needs of society as a whole. In this respect,
commodities that provide essential energy are replacing gold as the traditional
form of reserve currency. Thus oil is referred to as "black gold."
The
second question is, if we're looking to use a universal form of energy, where
do we look? Obviously, the most sought after forms of fossil fuel energy, such
as oil, are as poorly distributed and limited in supply about the earth as
gold. What is needed is a form of energy that is both renewable and is
universally available throughout the world.
I
propose that to establish a local currency with universal value, we consider
using some convenient measure of wood energy, which can be used for redemption
purposes. We might begin, for example, with something as simple as cordwood.
Even though the energy component of cordwood is variable and might not be
ideal, if you compare a cord of wood with the U.S. dollar in terms of its
constant value, the cord comes out way ahead. I only suggest this as a way to
begin; we will have to perfect it as we go along-perhaps developing an index of
different kinds of wood, or using one ton of dry wood. Consider also that in
addition to being used on a worldwide basis as a primary source of energy, wood
is also used for other basic needs, such as fruit and nuts for food, lumber for
building, and as a substitute for metals.
. . .
Therefore
the surplus would be invested in forests, or directly in cords of wood. A
community land trust would manage and control this resource. As a sufficient
potential supply of cordwood from the forests became available, each depositor
would then be issued a certificate (or note) measuring the value of his or her
deposit in energy, or cordwood-meaning that the deposit would be redeemable in
cordwood. With a ready and continuing supply of cordwood to "back"
its currency, the group would then be in a position to "issue" or
provide credit for projects of productive value within the local community.
. . .
Source: Schumacher Center for a New Economics, http://www.centerforneweconomics.org/publications/essays/swann/robert/appropriate-currency,
posted n. d., accessed 6 May 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment