Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Offsite Post: ‘My Country’

My country is not a snow-capped mountain

In the Colorado Rockies

Or a seacoast town in Maine

Or the tropical islands of Hawai’i.

Fine places to be sure,

With many fine folks,

But they are not my country.

My country is a little strip of land in Arkansas,

Near where the wagon wheel fell off –

The beginning of the Walton family homeplace there in Strong,

Where our roots have burrowed deeply down,

 . . .

The rest is at https://www.reckonin.com/walt-garlington/my-country-poetry.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, March 28, 2025

Remembrances for April - 2025

 

Dear friends, if you have time, please pray for these members of the Southern family on the day they reposed.  Many thanks.

But one may ask:  ‘What good does it do to pray for the departed?’  An answer is offered here:  https://orthochristian.com/130608.html

Along with prayers and hymns for the departed:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6je5axPodI

April 1st

Ellis Marsalis, Jr

One of New Orleans’s great jazz musicians.

https://selu.libguides.com/BlackHistorySELA/marsalis

April 2nd

Gen A. P. (Ambrose Powell) Hill

Amongst the best generals serving under Lee.  Both Jackson and Lee called upon him as they stepped into the life beyond death.

https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/hill-a-p-1825-1865/

April 3rd

Richard Weaver

Perhaps the greatest defender of Southern ways to be born in Dixie.

https://www.ncpedia.org/biography/weaver-richard-malcolm-jr

April 6th

Gen Albert Sidney Johnston

One of Dixie’s leaders during the War, killed at the Battle of Shiloh.

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/albert-sidney-johnston

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/4334/albert-sidney-johnston

April 7th

Judge Jackson

He helped the Southern folk-art of shape-note singing to blossom.

https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/blog/the-colored-sacred-harp/

April 9th

Appomattox Day

If you have time, please pray for the South on April 9th, Appomattox Day, the beginning of our sojourn in captivity.  Do some fasting as well if you can:  The Holy Fathers tell us and show us over and over again that humility attracts the Grace of God.

April 11th

Caroline Gordon

One of the South’s best writers of novels and short stories.

https://www.visitclarksvilletn.com/plan/clarksville-connections/literature-and-journalism/caroline-gordon/

April 11th

Gen Wade Hampton III

A fine calvary officer in the War; he was chosen to succeed JEB Stuart as the leader of that department after he was killed in battle.  After the war he served his State of South Carolina in political office.  A more dedicated man to the cause of Southern independence would be hard to find.

https://northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/wade-hampton-iii-1818-1902/

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/439/wade-hampton/photo

April 12th

Gen Richard Taylor

He lived and fought in Louisiana before and during the turbulent War years and was buried there after he died.

http://www.la-cemeteries.com/Notables/Civil%20War/Taylor,%20Richard/Taylor,Richard.shtml

https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/fta31

April 13th

Col Edmund Rucker

A leader under General Forrest in the War; lost his left arm at the Battle of Nashville.  After the war, he led the industrial development of Birmingham, Al.

https://www.geni.com/people/Col-Edmund-W-Rucker-CSA/6000000017376848156

April 18th

Grady McWhiney

Writer of one of the seminal works of Southern culture – Cracker Culture: Celtic Ways in the Old South.

https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/statesman/name/grady-mcwhiney-obituary?id=26939345

April 22nd

Fr Abram Ryan

An eloquent poet and priest beloved of people across the South.

https://catholicism.org/priest-poet-patriot-father-abram-j-ryan.html

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/7494769/abram-joseph-ryan

https://www.docsouth.unc.edu/southlit/ryan/ryan.html

April 22nd

Alabama Confederate Memorial Day

April 25th

Donald Davidson

Another outstanding 20th century defender of the South and an excellent writer of poems, non-fiction prose, and ballads.

https://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entries/donald-davidson/

https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2013/06/philosopher-poet-donald-davidson-agrarian-south.html

April 26th

Don Andrés Almonaster

A wealthy Spanish civil servant who lived in New Orleans during Spanish rule of Louisiana.  He gave very generously to rebuild the city after the Great Fire of 1788.  Two of his notable benefactions are what would become Charity Hospital and the St Louis Cathedral in which he is buried.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andres_Almonaster_y_Rojas

April 26th

Florida Confederate Memorial Day

April 28th

Jack Hinson

A family man in Tennessee trying to stay neutral in the War.  When Yankees murdered two of his sons in cold blood and mutilated their corpses, he became one of their deadliest enemies as a sniper.

https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/the-story-of-civil-war-sniper-jack-hinson-and-his-rifle/247860

https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/jack-hinsons-one-man-war/

April 29th

Mississippi Confederate Memorial Day

Also, to celebrate some of the saints of April from the South’s Christian inheritance of various lands, follow these links on over:

https://southernorthodox.org/orthodox-saints-for-dixie-april/

https://confiterijournal.blogspot.com/2020/05/happy-feast-for-saints-of-april.html

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Offsite Post: ‘A Southern Golden Age’

 

How the lands of our forebears once shone

With the iridescence of the Gospel’s glow!

Saint Timothy illumined northern Africa –

His body, burned alive, left ashes

Kindled with noetic fire

That drove away the darkness of idolatry

From a multitude of hearts.

Saint Manire of Scotland’s northern Highlands,

His apostolic preaching became more powerful

Through the persecution he endured –

His words and deeds, crystals radiating light.

 

Dixie’s carelessness and mulishness have allowed

Their memories, and many other holy ones’,

To be lost in the black mist of oblivion.

But our lives will never be complete without them,

For they are sacred members of Christ’s Body,

Filled with His Grace, and separate from them,

We deny ourselves deifying gifts.

 

How quickly should we repent of negligence

And willful spurning of these chosen ones,

 . . .

The rest is at https://www.dissidentmama.net/a-southern-golden-age/.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, March 21, 2025

Offsite Post: ‘Archbishop Elpidophoros vs the Holy Fathers on Americanism’

 

For self-defeating actions, the GOA’s Abp. Elpidophoros is the undisputed champion.  His 2024 encyclical for the 4th of July is the latest in a long line of such actions.  There are notable points where he is at odds with both history and with the judgment of holy saints of the Orthodox Church.

‘The Fourth of July is our National Birthday . . .’

False.  As we have previously pointed out, separation from the British Empire produced thirteen new nations, not one.  Now there are 50 nations, instead of 13.

‘ . . . celebrating the Declaration of Independence, a truly remarkable document that every American should read every year on this date.’

We actually agree with his Eminence on this point.  The Declaration is ‘truly remarkable’, but not in a positive way.  The Holy Father St. Athanasios Parios (+1813) demolishes the concepts lionized in that Enlightenment-tainted political treatise, such as individual freedom and equality.

Of freedom, he says,

 

 . . . I do not accept that people are born free (independent) in the world. On the contrary, I support and will prove that there is no such freedom in the world: people are born and live in the world as "slaves" (dependent) in many ways.

 

- People are "slaves" of God, just like the rest of creation. That people are "slaves" is so true, that when they are ignorant of their Creator and do not carry out His commandments, they are punished even for eternity. In fact, this punishment does not apply to any other tangible creature, because only people are distinguished from all the rest, since they have reason and have been adorned with the gift of autonomy, so they voluntarily become wicked and worthless servants and disobedient to the orders of their Master.

 

- Therefore, those who proclaim with words and decide in accordance with the law that people are born free are ignorant and foolish. Those who think this way are among the herd of Epicurus' followers. They are atheists and believe that the soul is mortal. They are apostates of the Divine revelations, rebels against the greatness of God Himself, deserving of hatred and despising by all creation, as enemies of God, the Creator and Lord of all. So here we have a way of "slavery" (dependence) that is necessary and inevitable, as long as it is impossible for the creature to deny its Creator, the formed its Fashioner, the caused its Cause. After all, who is so ignorant that they do not know that the constituent parts of man are two, that is, the body and the soul? And that the rational soul is the one that governs the body, that is, the irrational part, and causes it to move wherever and however it wants? So is there anyone who doesn't know and doesn't accept this truth, which is known even to the Gentiles? A slight observation is enough for everyone to locate it in their consciousness.

 

 . . . - When we encounter another kind of "slavery", dependence on the body, which is completely natural and necessary, how can various vain people say and write that people are born free? After all, isn't each of us born under parental authority? Don't parents naturally have the absolute power over us to treat us the way they want us to live when we don't live right or obey their promptings? Don't they punish us? Do they not renounce us and deprive us of our paternal inheritance?

 

- But isn't every head of household a kind of monarch at home? Doesn't he have different people at his workplace and he tells one "come" and they come, and to the other "do this" and they do it? And what happens to every apprentice and students of every specialty? Aren't they subject to the authority of their teachers, as if they were masters? Who can deny that they obey with respect and definitely carry out the orders and are severely punished when they do not obey the rules of apprenticeship accurately?

 

- When we see people subjected in so many ways and maybe even more, where is their natural freedom? Even if we consider that they can be freed from parental and doctrinal dependencies, how can we ignore the dominance of the innate soul and that of the First and Supreme Cause, that is, the Creator and God of all?

 

- To the extent that it is impossible for the Creator and Maker not to be the Lord and Master of men, and to the extent that it is impossible for the soul, as a rational and intangible nature, not to be the hegemonic part of human composition, it is to the same degree that it is impossible for people to be free, independent.

 

 . . . And, if that wise opinion is true (and must be true) that says "it is more burdensome to be enslaved to one's passions than to external tyrants," they are absolutely slaves to the passions, and this slavery is much more burdensome, worse and poorer than enslavement to tyrannical people. Because the body is by nature subject to the commands of the dominant soul, and for this reason it is not paradoxical to submit to some external power and perform bodily services and works. However, it is completely unheard of and paradoxical for the dominant soul to fall from its high order, the utterly free one, and to submit with its own will to the irrational and filthy passions of the body.

Of equality, the following:

 

- But with their declarations of freedom, they also link the declaration of Equality. And high on their flags they write "Freedom-Equality". And the reckless and relentless mob, what else more attractive, appealing and motivating for uprisings against superiors would they expect to hear beyond these declarations? With the proclamation of Freedom, he imagines himself free from all external human power, which he indiscriminately calls tyranny, even if it is not. With Equality statements, the water carrier and the one who cleans the feces, imagines himself as the most noble and prominent.

 

Stupid and vain people! If, as Gregory the Theologian says, the monkey imagines he is a lion, what good will such an imagination do him? Equal! Tell me, where is this equality? He lives in fancy palaces and towering towers, and you, unfortunate one, have a poor hut, enough to house your sick and tired body. He is resting in a golden and ivory bed and on soft mattresses, and by force you have a wooden mat, to lay down your tormented body. There is not much space left on his table due to the abundance of food and wine, and you just have some bread and some poor quality cheese to fool your hunger!

 

But why expand on the matter? How can two people be called equal when one is very rich and the other is starving and forced to steal because of his poverty? These declarations are an invention of cunning and insidious people, who, wanting to satisfy their passions and fulfill their evil desires, instilled in the minds of the common people this unbridled wind of equality, to help them achieve their purpose. Can there ever be equality in societies dominated by greed, dominated by passions, where no other expression is heard more often than "mine" and "yours"?

St. Athanasios points out where real equality can be found, and it ain’t in ‘Murcan ‘democracy’ or capitalism, but in the life of the Orthodox Church:

 

Equality, yes, did exist once! But where? In the newly formed Church of those good Christians, the simple and pious! There, as Saint Luke describes it (Acts 4:32), no one had anything of their own, but it was all common - money, clothes and food. But why was everything common? Because, he says, the hearts and souls of the faithful were one! Everyone had an opinion and a will about God and they were all connected with brotherly love, so close that, although they were a lot of people and of different ages, men and women, old and young, they were all so unified that they looked like one body that was moved by one soul.

 

The same equality and solidarity has existed for many centuries in the coenobiums of the Venerable ones of old, Pachomios, Savvas, Euthymios, Theodosios and many others, because in them brotherly love and solidarity were preserved. That, indeed, was true Equality!

If the Archbishop’s views of freedom and equality sound more Freemasonic than Christian, it is because they are.  St. Athanasios explains:

 . . .

The rest is at https://orthodoxreflections.com/archbishop-elpidophoros-vs-the-holy-fathers-on-americanism/.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Offsite Post: ‘The Black Lining around Loper v Raimondo’

 

The joy amongst folks on the Right over the federal Supreme Court’s overturning of its prior Chevron ruling in 1984 is understandable.  It was a terrible ruling that basically allowed federal executive agencies to determine the extent of their own powers.  Loper v Raimondo, handed down by the SC at the end of June, rightly ended that bit of lawlessness, but at the same time it reinforced a precedent that is every bit as harmful to justice and limited government:  It reinforced the notion that the federal Supreme Court has the final say on what is constitutional and what is not in the United States.

Chief Justice Roberts argues in the majority’s opinion in Loper,

The Framers also envisioned that the final “interpreta­tion of the laws” would be “the proper and peculiar province of the courts.” Id., No. 78, at 525 (A. Hamilton). Unlike the political branches, the courts would by design exercise “nei­ther Force nor Will, but merely judgment.” Id., at 523. To ensure the “steady, upright and impartial administration of the laws,” the Framers structured the Constitution to allow judges to exercise that judgment independent of influence from the political branches. Id., at 522; see id., at 522–524; Stern v. Marshall, 564 U. S. 462, 484 (2011).

This Court embraced the Framers’ understanding of the judicial function early on. In the foundational decision of Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice Marshall famously de­clared that “[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803). And in the following decades, the Court under­stood “interpret[ing] the laws, in the last resort,” to be a “solemn duty” of the Judiciary. United States v. Dickson, 15 Pet. 141, 162 (1841) (Story, J., for the Court). When the meaning of a statute was at issue, the judicial role was to “interpret the act of Congress, in order to ascertain the rights of the parties.” Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Pet. 497, 515 (1840).

This is the standard argument we’re all fed in our school textbooks – the Supreme Court in DC gets the final say.  But like a lot of things in those books, which are mostly written by a bunch of Leftists who love all-powerful, centralized governments, it isn’t true.  Nowhere in the federal constitution is the final interpretive power granted to the federal courts.  That was something John Marshall dreamt up when he was Chief Justice.  Such a power does not, in fact, lie anywhere in the federal government.  Thomas Jefferson, in his famous Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, written in response to the federal Alien and Sedition Acts that had made criticism of the federal government a crime, explains where that power lies and why:


1. Resolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes, delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.

The States themselves are the final judges, by virtue of the fact that they set up the federal government.

The flip-side of that coin is that the States therefore have the duty to stop unlawful actions of the federal government from impacting their citizens.  James Madison authored the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, also in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, which declare this without any hem-hawing:

 . . .

The rest is at https://thehayride.com/2024/07/garlington-the-black-lining-around-loper-v-raimondo/.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, March 14, 2025

Offsite Post: ‘In Defense of Christian Governments’

 

Rep. Chuck Owen recently wrote an essay trying to clarify misunderstandings surrounding the phrase ‘Christian nationalism’.  Unfortunately, it gets a little muddled at times.  Let’s start with this:

‘This country was founded on the premise that we would have religious liberty.   We were founded on the notion that the government SHALL MAKE NO LAW establishing a religion.’

This is not the case.  All of the colonies had some sort of established Christian Church, and some of these lasted well into the 1800s.  Furthermore, the colonies/States became independent of Great Britain in 1776; the 1st Amendment to the Philadelphia constitution wasn’t ratified until 1791.  And it also applies only to the federal government, and not at all to the States.  Thus, it is incorrect to claim that disestablishment of Christianity is a foundational part of US thought and life.

However, that is not to say that the 1st Amendment didn’t have an impact on religion in the States.  The secularism of it and the Philly constitution as a whole frightened plenty of folks who understood the impact they would have on the health and vitality of Christianity.

In 1811, ‘Samuel Austin, President of the University of Vermont, warned his congregation in a published sermon that the Constitution “has one capital defect which will issue inevitably in its destruction.  It is entirely disconnected from Christianity”’ (Christopher Ferrara, Liberty: The God That Failed, Tacoma, Wash., Angelico Press, 2012, p. 525).

Samuel Taggart of New Hampshire and Massachusetts, who served as a Presbyterian minister and as a US representative, warned in 1812, ‘ . . . it [the US constitution] takes no notice of, and is not at all connected with religion.  . . . It is a bold experiment, and one which, I fear, can only issue in national apostasy and national ruin’ (Ibid.).

‘Even more explicitly prophetic was the President of Wheaton College, Prof. Charles Blanchard, whose address to the 1874 convention, entitled “The Conflict of Law,” predicted that, failing adoption of the proposed Christian Amendment, no state law favorable to Christianity “can stand a suit in the Supreme Court of the United States. . . .  This conflict of law is inevitable and irrepressible.  Our laws will be heathenized or our Constitution Christianized, and Americans must soon decide which they will have done.”  In like manner, Felix Brunot’s address warned that while “Our nation is Christian . . . the Constitution is unchristian. . . .  Can this anomaly continue?  Impossible.  One by one your Christian laws . . . and all the Christian features of State Constitutions, must come to the test of the Constitution of the United States; and they must fall before it.”

‘ . . . Under the influence of the Godless Constitution as wielded by anti-Christian forces, predicted Tayler Lewis, it would not be long before “our whole political page becomes a pure, unbelieving, irreligious, Christless, Godless blank”’ (Ibid., pgs. 533-4, 535).

And so it has come to pass.

The whole idea behind the religious pluralism of constitutional items like the 1st Amendment is also misunderstood.  Those who promoted it, like Locke, Madison, and Jefferson, saw it as a way to weaken Christianity so that the government would have more freedom to implement whatever agenda it wanted to.

‘Hobbes and Locke did not merely seek to separate Church and State, but rather to subjugate the Church to the State by stripping the Church of any direct or indirect power over politics, reducing churches to the status of private clubs whose authority is strictly limited to enforcing club rules against their respective members’ (Ibid., p. 80).

‘As Locke foresaw, the unchallenged monism of state power that is at the essence of Liberty would be insured by a multiplicity of Christian sects.  . . . in the Essay Concerning Toleration, Locke advised that when any sect is “grown, or growing so numerous as to appear dangerous to the magistrate” the magistrate “may and ought to use all ways, either policy or power, that shall be convenient, to lessen, break and suppress the party, and so prevent the mischief”—the “mischief” being the mere existence of a dominant religious faction capable of posing a challenge to the State.  Both Jefferson and Madison, following Locke, expressly recognized the division of Christianity into sects as a primary safeguard of Liberty.  In his Notes on the State of Virginia, Jefferson observes that the “several sects perform the office of a Censor morum over each other,” preventing any one sect from installing the “Procrustean bed” of “uniformity” via government.  Likewise, in Federalist No. 51, written to persuade the holdout states to ratify the Constitution, Madison declares, with the supreme religious indifference of the Deist he was, that:

‘“In a free government the security for civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights.  It consists in the one case in the multiplicity of interests, and in the other in the multiplicity of sects.  The degree of security in both cases will depend on the number of interests and sects, and this may be presumed to depend on the extent of the country and number of people comprehended under the same government. . . . In the extended republic of the United States, and among the great variety of interests, parties, and sects which it embraces, a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good. . . .”

‘Like Locke, Madison viewed the very multiplicity of sects as necessary to secure “justice and the general good,” by which he means what Locke means:  “to preserve men in this world from the fraud and violence of one another” and “promoting the general welfare, which consists in riches and power” as determined by “the number and industry of your subjects.”  Christianity divided poses no threat to the power of the State . . . .  Lockean polities require for their equilibrium and survival a divide and conquer strategy toward Christianity as their only serious rival.  This is why, to recall Peter Gay’s startling observation, “political absolutism and religious toleration [are] the improbable twins of the modern state system”’ (Ibid., pgs. 542-3).

Having dutifully followed the Enlightenment principles of the 1st Amendment and related constitutional provisions of religious liberty/pluralism for a couple of centuries now, with the predicted result that Christianity has grown divided and weak, the predicted corollary has also come to pass:  Governments promote whatever they think is in their own interest, whether or not it is morally repugnant, and Christians generally lack the strength to oppose them in any meaningful way – . . .

The rest is at https://thehayride.com/2024/06/garlington-in-defense-of-christian-governments/.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!