Friday, April 22, 2022

Offsite Posts: Two Essays on Christianity in Public Schools

 

The first essay:

https://thehayride.com/2022/04/garlington-riverbend-elementary-could-lead-the-way-to-restoration/

Which garnered this reply:

https://thehayride.com/2022/04/sadow-little-room-for-louisiana-schools-to-encourage-religion/

And the answer to the reply:

https://thehayride.com/2022/04/garlington-parents-can-and-should-fight-for-christianity-in-public-schools/

Here is a portion from the first essay:


As circumstances of society change, laws and constitutions must sometimes change to fit them:  This is a basic axiom of political life in the States, and the recent controversy at Riverbend Elementary School in West Monroe illustrates a glaring need to put that axiom into practice. 


For, even though Easter is upon us, the holiest day of the year, when we celebrate Christ’s glorious Resurrection, His conquering of death and the devil, His gift of a new mode of being to mankind, KNOE reported on 15 April that the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) has issued a demand to Riverbend to disallow daily prayer at the school because of the complaint of a parent over the ritual.


The basis of this complaint is no doubt the clause in the Louisiana and federal constitutions that no laws shall be made to compel people to adhere to one particular creed or another (‘no establishment of religion’).  There was a time when that was the main religious concern of the peoples of the States – that one of the Christian communions, with support from the government at some level – local, State, federal, would persecute the other communions using political power.


That is no longer the case.  The main threat to Christianity now comes from the weaponization of clauses like those just mentioned by militant anti-Christian groups like FFRF, ACLU, et al. to expunge all public expressions of Christianity from society.


Louisianans have never been shy about amending their constitutions.  Now is not the time to abandon that habit.  For the sake of protecting the Christian faith in our State, Article 1, Section 8, which reads, ‘No law shall be enacted respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof’, needs to have added to it a few more words:  ‘In order to uphold the Christian faith which is the preeminent source of Louisiana’s culture, it may be given special preference over all other religions by any public entity in this State.’ 


Through such a change, a public school like Riverbend could voluntarily adopt Christian prayers and incorporate the teaching of Christianity into its curricula without fear of being sued; others could just as freely choose not to. 


Thus, no one would be forced to join a Christian communion, but it would be a salutary step towards protecting Christianity from its enemies.


The culture of the South grows largely out of the soil of Christianity.  If we value the fruits of it – kindness, hospitality, love of family, love of nature, respect for authority and the laws, good manners, beautiful architecture, etc. – we will take steps like those proposed above to strengthen it.


But while the process of amending gets underway, local action needs to begin immediately.  . . .

***

A shorter version of the first essay is here:

https://www.hannapub.com/ouachitacitizen/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/letter-to-the-editor-christian-faith-essential-to-riverbend-elementary/article_8a640160-c0b0-11ec-9f74-ebfa86bd8a16.html

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

‘Transgenderism Meets Transprofessionalism’

 

Our thanks to the kinsman of SM, who provided us with this parody.—W.G. 

***

The scene is set in a small psychiatrist’s office. The psychiatrist (P) sits behind a wooden desk next to a bookshelf and end table with a bust of Freud on it. The whole thing looks normal and professional. In the chair in front of the desk sits a man in drag (T) who is talking in a voice typical of sexual deviants.

T:  . . . and I just fear that I’m spending too much time obsessing over little things. Like dress color or whether these high heels are too flashy, you know? I fear that I’m losing sight of larger real problems like if my menstrual cycle is off or not—whether I’m ready for a pregnancy, you know? Sometimes I get really neurotic. Last week I spent two hours wondering whether I might have cervical cancer. Another of the women in my family got cervical cancer real young. But then I tell myself that it’s probably just a delusion that just because one of them had at this age that I would.

P: [who has been listening patiently and nodding at intervals] Yes, I definitely begin to get to the heart of your case here, and I think you nailed it with your emphasis on the delusional aspects of your case. In fact, I would say that although you operate under the cloud of many small delusions, every last one of them, and the problems that arise from them, falls under the umbrella of or can be traced back to one grand delusion.

T: You mean hypochondria? I wondered if it were that, because a lot of people in my family have hypochondria.

P: No, I mean the delusion that you’re a woman.

T: [staring at him in shock] What!

P: I mean you’re under the delusion that you’re a woman and not just some guy in drag.

T: [getting upset] What are you talking about?! I am a woman!

P: No, women have mammary glands, ovaries and cervices. I haven’t seen an x-ray or a physical, but I’m 99.9% sure that you don’t. Hence, you are not a woman, but merely a man under the delusion that he’s a woman.

T: [going from being upset to angry] Why are you talking to me as if there are gender binaries?

P: [keeping the same casual, conversational tone] Well, because there are? They’re physiological facts.

T: [getting angrier and shriller] No they’re not! They’re social constructs!

P:  Nooo, they’re biological facts rooted in nature. The living parts of the entire natural world are geared toward reproduction of DNA: in the simple creatures this is done by asexual reproduction; but in higher life, this is accomplished by the fusion of the two gametes, a male and a female—the binaries, if you will. These are perfectly natural and have been so for hundreds of millions of years before mentally and emotionally unstable humans decided to pretend that they don’t exist or that they’re a social delusion.

T: [continuing to fume] If they’re so natural why don’t people like me believe in them?! Why aren’t we covered by them if they’re so damn right?!

P: Well, because nature isn’t perfect and sometimes mistakes arise in the physiological makeup of her organisms. The mere fact that a dog is occasionally born with three legs doesn’t somehow disprove the idea that four legs for a dog is natural, or prove that the idea that dogs are either born with four legs or have suffered a birth defect is a social construct. The physiological defects of you and those sharing your same delusion are merely regrettable accidents of nature much like the dog’s three legs—though in your case they’re most likely rooted in an off-kilter endocrine system and neurochemical complex.

T: [screaming] No they’re NOT! This—this is madness! You’re just part of the conspiracy to uphold white supremacy and discriminate against victims of nonbinary gender!

P: No, you’re a victim of nature’s unfortunate tendency to make mistakes and human nature’s unfortunate tendency to try to rationalize mistakes and flaws as strengths or advantages.

T: I am not rationalizing! I am a woman and a victim of discrimination! A victim of those who want to uphold white-male, binary-gender supremacy!

P: Oh, so it’s a social construct invented by straight, white males, eh?

T: [nodding angrily but confidently] Yes!

P: [matter-of-factly]: Well, in that case, name me one human society in the history of the world that didn’t believe that two binary genders is the natural order of things.

T: [hesitating] Well, there’s  . . . Well, just look at the, uh . . . the—well of course there’s, um  . . . the—if I’m just under a delusion, then why do so many politicians and celebrities and academics believe the same thing! [Grinning triumphantly] Tell me that!

P: Most of them likely don’t. It’s a case of what we call mass formation psychosis, something common under totalitarian regimes with crazy ideologies that are internally illogical or contrary to human nature or both. It’s basically a mass madness arising from a conglomeration of all the parties involved pursuing their separate goals under the regime’s loony doctrine: the leaders want the power of total control over their subjects so they pretend to believe their own ideological bilge; the social climbers and professional classes employed or monitored by the state pretend to believe it to get ahead or not get sacked or worse; most ordinary people pretend to believe it just to get on with their lives without being persecuted; and the rest just make themselves try to believe it so that they don’t feel crazy and isolated living in nationwide asylum in which everybody else seems to believe it.

T: [looking incredulous] You’re saying this is, this is a totalitarian society?

P: I’m saying that the national security apparatus that has spent decades pulling regime changes on foreign nations and psychological warfare on those citizens and its own is finally so drunk on its own power that it’s giving the country strong elements of one.

T: That’s crazy, they wouldn’t do that! They couldn’t get enough people to go along with it.

P: Why not? They got them to go along with the Iraqi weapons-of-mass-destruction story, and now the garbage about white supremacy.

T: [screaming] That is not garbage it’s true!

P: Really? So a society in which straight white males hold supreme power and oppress everyone else naturally allows every one of its politicians, celebrities, and university professors to spends half their time telling everyone how evil straight white males are and using every third speech, movie, and research to denounce “whites supremacy”?

T: [looking flustered] Well, they—well of course it sounds stupid when you say it that way!

P: No, it sounds stupid when you say it in any way that puts it in a larger context.

T: [looking irritable] But why would they pretend to believe in transgenderism to control people?

P: Eh, that’s pretty normal among cults and governments doing mass formation psychosis. Getting people to believe something that’s fairly normal or likely doesn’t really let you gauge what degree of control you’ve got over the population: to really know that you’ve got ‘em by the short hairs, you need to see them at least pretending to believe something no one on his own would believe in a million years; something that is utterly crazy, unnatural, and/or humiliating to even pretend to believe—something like the idea that a man can become a woman just by believing it.

T: [enraged] That is NOT humiliating to believe!

P: You’re right: it’s humiliating and crazy to believe!

T: [still fuming but now sneering smugly] Well if it’s so damn unnatural or humiliating, and everyone’s just pretending to believe it, why do some people go to get transgender surgery on their own?!

P: It’s what you might call the transgender cure—in the same vein as the geographic cure. You

see, hope springs eternal in the human breast for the most part, and when a person is already miserable most of the time from whatever neurochemical or physiological flaws they already have, they naturally gravitate to anything that promises and quick and complete cure for them, however irrational it might be. Sometimes they convince themselves—a la the geographic cure—that their problems are a result of their current location and circumstances and that if they can just leave it and get to city X, then they’ll feel better; but then they get there and find their old misery waiting for them. Similarly, sometimes they convince themselves—with a lot of help from the nutcases lobbying to get this madness taken seriously—that their misery is a result of their having been “born the wrong gender,” or some such nonsense, and that they’ll feel happy if they can only “change genders,” but then they go “trans” and find not only their old misery waiting for them, but a hell of a lot more thanks to the hormone-altering drugs that have wreaked havoc with their already out-of-whack neurological and endocrine systems. Why do you think about half of all “transgenders” end up killing themselves?

T: It’s because we’re bullied so much and face so much discrimination! We’re victims!

P: Oh, kind of like blacks?

T: Yes! Exactly! We’re the blacks of the gender world!

P: Did you ever look at black suicide rates?

T: [staring blankly] What?

P: Did you ever look at black suicide rates?

T: [still looking confused] No, why would I?

P: Well, because if your theory holds, we should expect to see the black rate of suicides per capita similar to those of trannies, or at least higher than the rate for whites, but in fact what we see is that the white suicide rate is more than twice the rate of blacks[i].

T: [looking incredulous] It is?

P: Yeeesss, which strongly points to your victims theory being just a crude ad hoc excuse to cover the pathological nature of your physiological and neurochemical condition.

T: [raising his voice to a whiny scream as he goes] It is not! It is the truth! We’re victims! Stop denying our VICTIMHOOD!

P: Uh, before lecturing me about your “victimhood” and my ostensible denial of it, you might want to stop asserting that your cohorts are more likely to be murdered than straight, white male “oppressors.”

T: [livid with rage] That—that’s not true! That’s impossible! You probably just got that from some Right-wing conspiracy theorist!

P: Noooo, from an “American Journal of Public Health” analysis[ii].

T: [starts, stops in consternation and then starts again] Look, all we want is to be treated with kindness and respect.

P: No, you don’t. Your want power; you want domination. You want to turn your biological flaws and vices into advantages and virtues—to force those who don’t have your problems to call you their moral superiors and shower you with praise, perks, and federal funds to whatever organization your cohorts put together to whine for even more money and attention. You want to be able to get easy promotions at whatever job you do even if your work is mediocre or outright bad by threatening anyone who might object with a lawsuit for “discriminating” against you. Your want the legal designation of an official “victim” so that you can grandstand as one while acting like a bully, tyrant, and arrogant jerk. You may be screwed up like hell biochemically, but that doesn’t preclude your having the usual human flaws—including trying to get something for nothing at someone else’s expense.

T: [enraged and screaming] I am NOT! You—you can’t treat me this way! I’m reporting all this to the American Psychiatric Association, so get ready to kiss your license goodbye!

P: [nonchalantly] That’s impossible. I don’t have a license.

T: [staring at him in shock] What do you mean you don’t have a license? You mean you lost it before this?

P: No, I haven’t got it . . . yet.

T: You mean it’s pending?

P; Well it will be eventually, once I get a psychiatry degree

T: You don’t even have a degree?! You never got a degree?!

P: Do you think if I’d spent a half dozen years and tens of thousands of dollars getting my ego inflated while loading up with whatever crap the universities and their pompous, hermetically insulated tenurees are peddling at the moment, and had a license to loose I’d be able to tell you honestly what a physiologically messed up bastard you are?

T: Then—then .  . . how the hell are you practicing psychiatry?!

P: Because I identify as a psychiatrist.

T: [staring in horror] This is crazy! You can’t be a psychiatrist just by saying you are! You’re NOT one!

P: Yeah, well you’re not a female.

T: [screaming] That’s totally different!

P: No, it’s not.

T: You have no degree!

P: You have no vagina.

T: You—you don’t have the training!

P: You don’t menstruate.

T: You have no right to be diagnosing people! You haven’t passed the state test and you probably couldn’t pass it even if you wanted to!

P: [genially] Well, I’ve got an infinitely better change at passing it cold-turkey than you’ve got of conceiving children.

T: You . . . I—how have you been getting away with this?! How have you been writing out prescriptions?!

P: [casually] I’ve got a buddy who identifies as a pharmacist.

T: [looking like the world is crashing down around him] This is insane! This is beyond insane! You can’t—you don’t! You can’t just pretend you’re something you’re not and expect the whole world to go along with it!

P: [addresses his patient concernedly, like a calm teacher] Look, I understand your concern. This is probably all a little new and unsettling to you, but if progress is to be made in our world we have to acknowledge the fallacy of the hoary old idea of professional binaries—or, in layman’s terms, the prejudice that tries to draw a distinction between those who have licenses or degrees and those who don’t. Professionalism in the true sense is not an either/or matter, it’s a continuum, with plenty of nuance and gray areas in every way.

T: Do you know how insane this is all making me feel?! How do you think it makes me feel knowing

I’ve been pouring my heart out to some lunatic who thinks he can take my money and trash my gender identity just because he pretends to be a psychiatrist?!

P: How do you think a makes girls feel when some crazy bastard in drag comes walking into their bathroom and expects them not to get freaked out just because he pretends to be a woman?

T: But I am a woman.

P: Yeah, well then I’m a psychiatrist!

T: [sitting back looking exhausted and staring]

P: You look a bit overcome. Let me get a little further into my diagnosis of what ails you. You suffer from a severe case of a condition we like to call hypocriticus maximus—is estimated to be prevalent in at least 70% of Leftists in general and up to 90% of the subgroup of unmarried bitchy women!

T: [screaming[ I am not a bitchy, hypocritical woman!

P: Well, you’re half right about that

T: I want my money back!

P: Sure, I’ll give you your money back . . . juuuust as soon as you give back that silver medal you won in “women’s” track.

T: [stands up staring in silent rage and turns to walk out]

P: Uh, I wouldn’t leave just yet if I were you.

T: [talking through clenched teeth] Why the hell wouldn’t I leave now?!

P: The office next door’s furnace was on the fritz and it’s being worked on as we speak by a guy who identifies as a furnace repair man. You might want to wait until he finishes.

[Suddenly there’s an explosion from beyond the wall to the right of the psychiatrist. Through his glass door you see people screaming and running followed by a burst of flame.]

P: Never mind, it should be fine now. See ya!

[The camera cuts to outside the office. The tranny walks angrily out the door, through which you see the psychiatrist sitting back casually and smoking a cigar. The camera pulls back and you see the charred shop next door. Then it ends.]


[i] According to a May of 2021 Journal of the American Medical Association research letter, the suicide rate for blacks is 7.4 per 100,000 individuals; and 17.6 per 100,000 individuals for whites.

Ramchand, Rajeev, Joshua A. Gordon, and Jane L. Pearson. “Trends in Suicide Rates by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.” JAMA Network Open 4, no. 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11563.

[ii] “Results. The overall homicide rate of transgender individuals was likely to be less than that of cisgender individuals, with 8 of 12 RR estimates below 1.0.”

Dinno, ScD, MPH, MEM, Alexis. “Homicide Rates of Transgender Individuals in the United States: 2010–2014.” AJPH RESEARCH 197, no. 9 (September 2017): 1441–47. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303878.

Note: The skit would be incredibly cheap to do if you merely cut out the part showing the charred office next door.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, April 15, 2022

Offsite Post: ‘A Smidge of Restraint Might Help in Ukraine’

 

The international order continues to burn in the flames emanating from the Ukraine.  At this point we would all do well to consider the virtues of restraint and neutrality.  It is the lack of those two things that has gotten us where we are:


 . . . the facts really aren’t complicated. Russia’s recent invasion, far from being “unprovoked” (as shamelessly claimed in mainstream media), follows eight years of the US-backed Ukrainian regime’s deadly shelling of ethnic Russians near the border of Russia itself, in fighting that has killed more than 13,000 civilians in territory Vladimir Putin’s administration pledged to protect long ago.


And that carnage had a fairly obvious cause, too: it was precipitated by the US-supported coup that toppled Ukraine’s elected government in 2014, ostensibly because of human rights abuses but more fundamentally because that government had refused to convert the former Soviet republic into a vassal state of NATO.


The machinations resulting in what is now called the “Maidan coup” destroyed Ukraine’s neutrality between Russia and the West, unleashing in its stead a violent and bigotednationalist movement for which the inhabitants of the Don River basin, mostly ethnic Russians, have been paying with their lives ever since.


That much should be clear to all unbiased readers – like the fact that NATO’s relentless march toward the Russian border (in direct violation of U.S. officials’ promise to Russian leadership as far back as 1990) is the real story of “aggression” behind the manufactured outrage over the Russian “attack” on Ukraine.

But the tossing aside of restraint by the West wasn’t haphazard, continues Michael Lesher, the author of the essay linked above; the goal was to continue the push for a ‘Great Reset’ that covid began:


In a very real sense, this propaganda campaign is an extension of the lockdowns imposed on the populations of the Western “democracies” (I add the quotation marks mournfully but advisedly) in early 2020 – and of the attacks on the freedoms of their citizens for which COVID-19 is no longer as sturdy a pretext as it seemed to be two years ago. For most of us, that is really its primary significance.


In other words, the agenda underlying the new Cold War – and mind you, it’s already a pretty hot “cold war” when Atlantic Magazine, formerly a storehouse of liberal antiwar pieties, is chiding the US for not being sufficiently “bloody and brutal” in Ukraine – is not aimed at Russia (despite the US-led economic warfare that mainly targets blameless Russian citizens). It’s not even aimed at Ukraine (notwithstanding obvious US efforts to exacerbate the conflict by flooding the country with weapons).


The real target is us. And whatever news we see from Ukraine in the mainstream press – now, tomorrow, a month from now, whenever – that’s one point we mustn’t forget.


Remember the rapid erosion of free speech throughout the West as the COVID coup started to intensify? Well, that was just a foretaste of the censorship we can expect to see on social media as our opinion-makers shift to a Cold War footing. Remember the marginalization of news sources whose information about SARS-CoV-2 didn’t square with the Official Message?


The senseless banning of RT in many “free” countries since Russia’s invasion suggests how that trend will proceed. Remember the way accurate public comment about Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates became an act of sedition as of 2020?


Today, arbitrary government crackdowns (no warning, no trial, no proof of illegal acts) are already getting worse; war hysteria will further aggravate them.


As for the economy, Reuters is reporting “wild swings in the prices of oil, metals and other raw materials” – surely a harbinger of worse things to come.


In fact, rising consumer prices, shortages, fiscal contraction, increased unemployment – all products of lockdowns – are already showing signs of spiraling out of control as the super-rich fatten off war profiteering and the rest of us are lectured about the “sacrifices” expected of us in the fight against the Russian Beelzebub.


If anyone denies that these things represent the actual goals of the warmongering over Ukraine, I have one question for him: can you please suggest a more persuasive explanation for what otherwise resembles a case of collective insanity among the war promoters?


 . . .


So the senseless violence the U.S. and its allies have provoked in Ukraine is not really a new war at all. From the perspective of the Western citizenry – for the purposes of people like me and most of my likely readers – it’s only another front in the war for the New Normal, a war that has been waged against us for years and which shows no sign of stopping.


Recognizing that is not to dismiss the genuine suffering caused by the violence, nor does it require us to overlook other reasons for seeking to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict.


But it does warn us against limiting our attention to suffering in a distant place while our own freedoms are under attack. It reminds us that specific pretexts for dismantling democratic government come and go, but that the appetite of the ruling class for increased power is permanent and insatiable.


It cautions us against complacency, reminding us that no one will protect our rights if we ourselves don’t – especially when our press is full of lies and our public intellectuals endorse mass surveillance and war hysteria.


Yes, we are at war.


But it’s a war fought on our own soil and against oppressors much closer to home than a Russian president. Our enemies are human automata who want to strip life of the freedom without which life is meaningless. Our principal weapons are the only ones that work against such enemies: truth, compassion, dignity, determination and love.

To give credence to what he is saying, one only has to consider the admission by certain US intelligence officers about feeding doubtful intelligence to the media to stoke the fires of war in the US population.  Via Ron Paul (with more details here):


Last week an extraordinary article appeared in, of all places, NBC News, reporting that the US intelligence community is knowingly feeding information it does not believe accurate to the US mainstream media for the American audience to consume.


In other words, the article reports that the US “deep state” admits to being actively engaged in lying to the American people in the hopes that it can manipulate public opinion


According to the NBC News article, “multiple US officials acknowledged that the US has used information as a weapon even when confidence in the accuracy of the information wasn’t high. Sometimes it has used low-confidence intelligence for deterrent effect…”


Readers will recall the shocking headlines that Russia was prepared to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, that China would be providing military equipment to Russia, that Russian President Putin was being fed misinformation by his advisors, and more.


All of these were churned out by the CIA to be repeated in the American media even though they were known to be false. It was all about, as one intelligence officer said in the article, “trying to get inside Putin’s head.”


That may have been the goal, but what the CIA actually did was get inside America’s head with false information meant to shape public perception of the conflict. They lied to propagandize us in favor of the Biden Administration’s narrative.

Rather than yell and scream for more offensive weapons for the Ukraine, considering the manipulation we’ve all been subjected to, now is the time to opt for neutrality and restraint.  Not only has non-interference been a key part of traditional US foreign policy since Washington’s time, it is also an integral part of Western culture that we have inherited from the ancients:

 . . .

The rest is at https://thehayride.com/2022/04/garlington-a-smidge-of-restraint-might-help-in-ukraine/.

***

A related essay, a bit dated now, but some points are still relevant:

https://thehayride.com/2022/02/garlington-the-apocalypse-for-our-politicians-has-arrived/.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!