It is not
uncommon to find comparisons of the decrepit United States Empire with the
decaying late, pre-Christian Roman Empire.
In one area, the disparity in wealth between the rich and the poor, the
US are not only comparable to the Romans – they surpass them. A study in
2011 found the following:
Over the last 30
years, wealth in the United States has been steadily concentrating in the upper
economic echelons. Whereas the top 1 percent used to control a little over 30
percent of the wealth, they now control 40 percent. It’s a trend that was for decades
brushed under the rug but is now on the tops of minds and at the tips of
tongues.
Since too much
inequality can foment revolt and instability, the CIA regularly updates statistics on income distribution for
countries around the world, including the U.S. Between 1997 and 2007,
inequality in the U.S. grew by almost 10 percent, making it more unequal than
Russia, infamous for its powerful oligarchs. The U.S. is not faring well
historically, either. Even the Roman Empire, a society built on conquest and
slave labor, had a more equitable income distribution.
To determine the
size of the Roman economy and the distribution of income, historians Walter
Schiedel and Steven Friesen pored over papyri ledgers, previous scholarly
estimates, imperial edicts, and Biblical passages. Their target was the state
of the economy when the empire was at its population zenith, around 150 C.E.
Schiedel and Friesen estimate that the top 1 percent of Roman society
controlled 16 percent of the wealth, less than half of what America’s top 1
percent control.
With the
transfer of trillions of dollars to the world’s richest people because
of covid, this inequality in the US has likely gotten even worse. This wouldn’t be quite so bad if the super
wealthy were using their money for good purposes. In the Roman Empire, the richest class made
good enough use of their money that we still admire their works today. From the same 2011 study: ‘But buried at the end, they make a point
that’s difficult to parse, yet provocative. They point out that the majority of
extant Roman ruins resulted from the economic activities of the top 10
percent.’ In other words, the Roman
upper class was responsible for the aqueducts, theaters, temples, baths, etc., before
which people stand in awe when they visit former Roman lands.
What have
the US billionaires been spending their money on? Nothing quite so admirable,
unfortunately. While there are some
respectable projects funded by some of them, such as housing the poor and
treating malaria patients, much of it is going towards a conglomeration of woke
social justice nonsense, transhumanism, promoting a one-world government, and
regime change operations. A couple of
examples, via
Forbes:
Mark Zuckerberg & Priscilla Chan
Source of Wealth: Facebook
Net Worth: $112.8 billion
Giving Focus: Science, education, criminal justice
Lifetime Giving: $3 billion
The
Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) CEO and his wife Priscilla Chan, a doctor,
have multiple ambitious goals, including to cure, prevent or manage all
diseases. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, their philanthropic and advocacy
organization, says it has given out $3 billion in grants since it was founded
in 2015, backing scientific and medical research, as well as education and
criminal justice reform. At the end of 2021, CZI announced a new, ten-year,
$3.4 billion initiative focusing on measuring and analyzing biological
processes in the human body. The effort includes the creation of an institute
for advanced biomedical imaging and a hub at Harvard working on using AI and
machine learning in biology and medicine.
Ted
Turner
Source of
Wealth: Cable
television
Net
Worth: $2.3 billion
Giving
Focus: United
Nations, environment
Lifetime
Giving: $1.4 billion
If not for his
$1.4 billion of lifetime giving, the man behind Turner Broadcasting and CNN
wouldn’t have fallen off Forbes’
list of the 400 richest Americans in 2021. But it was only a matter of time:
like many other philanthropic billionaires, Turner signed the Giving Pledge and
will donate the majority of his wealth eventually–he’s just closer than most to
reaching this goal. The bulk of his philanthropy came before 2014, when he
completed a $1 billion pledge to establish the United Nations Foundation,
enabling the U.N. to raise money from philanthropists. Turner’s own namesake
foundation is focused on environmental protection, which he views as "an effort to
ensure the survival of the human species."
It would
seem that the States will not be getting much in the way of timeless
architecture, useful public works, etc., from these folks.
Even worse,
much of the billionaires’ donations are given in such a way as to further
increase their wealth, i.e., to help themselves, rather than to truly help
others:
. . .
The rest is
at https://orthodoxreflections.com/what-would-make-us-billionaires-more-generous/.
--
Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us
sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment