Why are so many deadly new diseases originating in Africa? It is not by coincidence but rather by design. The Elite have quite a strong loathing for Africans and any others they consider to be lower creatures than themselves (like the poor and numerous Indians, Chinese, and so on), on whom the resources of the world must be ‘wasted’ (in their view). The history of Planned Parenthood in the [u]nited States shows this quite plainly.
The eugenics ideology of the Elite is described briefly in an essay on that history:
. . .
Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and "purtiy"," particularly of the "Aryan" race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the "fit" to reproduce and the "unfit" to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the "inferior" races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.
Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race. He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this "population crisis." According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people. His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826:
All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room is made for them by the deaths of grown persons. We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality.
Malthus disciples believed if Western civilization were to survive, the physically unfit, the materially poor, the spiritually diseased, the racially inferior, and the mentally incompetent had to be suppressed and isolated–or even, perhaps, eliminated. His disciples felt the subtler and more "scientific" approaches of education, contraception, sterilization and abortion were more "practical and acceptable ways" to ease the pressures of the alleged overpopulation.
Critics of Malthusianism said the group "produced a new vocabulary of mumbo-jumbo. It was all hard-headed, scientific and relentless." Further, historical facts have proved the Malthusian mathematical scheme regarding overpopulation to be inaccurate, though many still believe them.
Despite the falsehoods of Malthus’ overpopulation claims, Sanger nonetheless immersed herself in Malthusian eugenics. Grant wrote she argued for birth control using the "scientifically verified" threat of poverty, sickness, racial tension and overpopulation as its background. Sanger’s publication, The Birth Control Review (founded in 1917) regularly published pro-eugenic articles from eugenicists, such as Ernst Ruin. Although Sanger ceased editing The Birth Control Review in 1929, the ABCL continued to use it as a platform for eugenic ideas.
Sanger built the work of the ABCL, and, ultimately, Planned Parenthood, on the ideas and resources of the eugenics movement. Grant reported that "virtually all of the organization’s board members were eugenicists." Eugenicists financed the early projects, from the opening of birth control clinics to the publishing of "revolutionary" literature. Eugenicists comprised the speakers at conferences, authors of literature and the providers of services "almost without the exception." And Planned Parenthood’s international work was originally housed in the offices of the Eugenics Society. The two organizations were intertwined for years.
. . .
Source: Tanya L. Green, ‘The NEGRO PROJECT: Margaret Sanger's EUGENIC Plan for Black America’, http://blackgenocide.org/archived_articles/negro.html, posted 2012, accessed 4 Nov. 2014
Dr Cyril Broderick of Liberia is unabashed in claiming that the Ebola virus is the latest in a series of attacks on the people of Africa by the Elite:
. . .
1. EBOLA IS A GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM (GMO)
Horowitz (1998) was deliberate and unambiguous when he explained the threat of new diseases in his text, Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola - Nature, Accident or Intentional. In his interview with Dr. Robert Strecker in Chapter 7, the discussion, in the early 1970s, made it obvious that the war was between countries that hosted the KGB and the CIA, and the ‘manufacture’ of ‘AIDS-Like Viruses’ was clearly directed at the other. In passing during the Interview, mention was made of Fort Detrick, “the Ebola Building,” and ‘a lot of problems with strange illnesses’ in “Frederick [Maryland].” By Chapter 12 in his text, he had confirmed the existence of an American Military-Medical-Industry that conducts biological weapons tests under the guise of administering vaccinations to control diseases and improve the health of “black Africans overseas.” The book is an excellent text, and all leaders plus anyone who has interest in science, health, people, and intrigue should study it. I am amazed that African leaders are making no acknowledgements or reference to these documents.
. . .
3. SITES AROUND AFRICA, AND IN WEST AFRICA, HAVE OVER THE YEARS BEEN SET UP FOR TESTING EMERGING DISEASES, ESPECIALLY EBOLA
The World Health Organization (WHO) and several other UN Agencies have been implicated in selecting and enticing African countries to participate in the testing events, promoting vaccinations, but pursuing various testing regiments. The August 2, 2014 article, West Africa: What are US Biological Warfare Researchers Doing in the Ebola Zone? by Jon Rappoport of Global Research pinpoints the problem that is facing African governments.
Obvious in this and other reports are, among others:
(a) The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), a well-known centre for bio-war research, located at Fort Detrick, Maryland;
(b) Tulane University, in New Orleans, USA, winner of research grants, including a grant of more than $7 million the National Institute of Health (NIH) to fund research with the Lassa viral hemorrhagic fever;
(c) the US Center for Disease Control (CDC);
(d) Doctors Without Borders (also known by its French name, Medicins Sans Frontiers);
(e) Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company;
(f) The UK’s GlaxoSmithKline; and
(g) the Kenema Government Hospital in Kenema, Sierra Leone.
Reports narrate stories of the US Department of Defense (DoD) funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a “First in Human” Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March. Disturbingly, many reports also conclude that the US government has a viral fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Kenema, a town at the epicentre of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The only relevant positive and ethical olive-branch seen in all of my reading is that Theguardian.com reported, “The US government funding of Ebola trials on healthy humans comes amid warnings by top scientists in Harvard and Yale that such virus experiments risk triggering a worldwide pandemic.” That threat still persists.
. . .
Source: ‘Ebola, AIDS Manufactured by Western Pharmaceuticals, US DoD?’, http://liberianobserver.com/security/ebola-aids-manufactured-western-pharmaceuticals-us-dod, posted 9 Sept. 2014, accessed 28 Oct. 2014
Further proof of weaponized Ebola comes from South Africa:
Operating out of South Africa during the Apartheid era in the early 1980’s, Dr. Wouter Basson launched a secret bioweapons project called Project Coast.
The goal of the project was to develop biological and chemical agents that would either kill or sterilize the black population and assassinate political enemies. Among the agents developed were Marburg and Ebola viruses.
. . .
Source: Dan Taylor, ‘Secret Project Created Weaponized Ebola in South Africa in the 1980s’, http://www.infowars.com/secret-project-created-weaponized-ebola-in-south-africa-in-the-1980s/print/ (via http://gizadeathstar.com), posted 20 Oct. 2014, accessed 4 Nov. 2014
* * *
In the mystery of God’s loving providence, black Africans and white Europeans have been joined together in the South. We have never accepted the satanic eugenics espoused by Margaret Sanger, et al. Rather, the South’s attitude (until corrupted by the racism of the North after the War) was typified by this statement from Sociology for the South: Or the Failure of Free Society by George Fitzhugh (1854):
We abhor the doctrine of the "Types of Mankind;" first, because it is at war with scripture, which teaches us that the whole human race is descended from a common parentage; and, second, because it encourages and incites brutal masters to treat negroes, not as weak, ignorant and dependent brethren, but as wicked beasts, without the pale of humanity. The Southerner is the negro's friend, his only friend. Let no intermeddling abolitionist, no refined philosophy, dissolve this friendship (p. 95, http://docsouth.unc.edu/southlit/fitzhughsoc/fitzhugh.html, UNC Chapel Hill electronic edition, posted 2004, accessed 4 Nov. 2014).
Knowing what we do (which Mr Fitzhugh and others of his day seemingly did not) about the saints of Africa (St Anthony the Great and other holy, wonderworking, and wise ascetics of the Egyptian desert), we may dispense with the notion of the limited potential of the African.
What is important are his last lines there: ‘The Southerner is the negro's friend, his only friend. Let no intermeddling abolitionist, no refined philosophy, dissolve this friendship.’
Is it truly to be thought that there is no significance to white and black being brought together in the South, to live side by side with one another? Can it be that we who lived with affection towards one another before Yankee intermeddling will remain cold-hearted forevermore?
Or is there a role for these Southrons, black and white together, to yet play? At home, a protector of the poor whites of Appalachia, etc. and the blacks; abroad, a protector of our African cousins (and others likewise circumstanced): all of whom are being mercilessly exploited, tortured, and killed for the material gain of the satanic Elite. Not that we shall go into other countries with ‘guns a-blazing’ but rather that we shall speak up on their behalf, and gather together allies from around the world who can help them protect themselves from such enemies (at home let us personally interpose as is proper and right).
The same God who watches after each sparrow and knows the number of hairs on our heads has made of Africa and Northern Europe one family in the South. Let us fast and pray that we will know what our response to this mystery ought to be.