Because of the influence of Islam on Protestantism
that we wrote of aforetime, it should not be surprising to learn that
Protestants imitated the Muslims in the hatred they showed towards holy images,
relics, and so forth. Below is part of
an article that recounts the Reformation’s iconoclasm. The reader is encouraged to visit the site
itself for þe (the) whole essay and for the artwork that we left out that tells
the sad story of Protestant-Muslim fellow-working in fordoing (destroying)
sacred art and objects.
In
a recent Times Literary Supplement,
David Motadel reviewed James Noyes’s 2013 book The Politics of Iconoclasm: Religion, Violence and the Culture of
Image-Breaking in Christianity and Islam. The review, and the
associated scholarship, raises important questions about how we conceive of the
Reformation, how we teach it, and, significantly, how we will commemorate the
500th anniversary of the event in 2017.
Motadel
writes that,
“The
prototype of all modern forms of iconoclasm [Noyes] found in Calvin’s Geneva and Ibn Abd al-Wahhab’s Mecca. Sixteenth-century Geneva witnessed one of the most devastating
waves of religious image-breaking in history. Incited by a group of charismatic
theologians – among them John Calvin himself – mobs raged against objects
associated with miracles, magic and the supernatural, destroying some of the
city’s most precious pieces of Christian art. Invoking the Second Commandment,
they denounced these works as idols, and as remnants of a rural, feudal and
superstitious world, a world corrupted by Satan.”
Nor
was Geneva
unusual. In Basel
in 1529, widespread iconoclastic riots destroyed virtually all the material
tokens of traditional Catholic worship and devotion in the cathedral and the
city’s leading churches. Even these German and Swiss manifestations were
dwarfed by the devastating Storm of Images (Beeldenstorm)
that swept over the Netherlands
in 1566.
This
movement was directed against any and all Catholic material symbols — against
stained glass windows, statues of the Virgin and saints, holy medals and
tokens.
Such
stories of image-breaking (iconoclasm) are familiar enough to anyone who knows
about the Reformation, and there are plenty of scholarly studies.
Recent
works, though, highlight two features of the movement that often get
underplayed:
1. Iconoclasm was central to the Reformation experience, not marginal,
and not just a regrettable extravagance.
Historians
of the Reformation tend to be bookish people interested in books, so they focus
on aspects of literacy and translation, with the spread of the vernacular Bible
as the centerpiece of the story. The idea of the Reformation as a “media
revolution” is common enough.
Yes,
we do read of outbreaks of destructive violence and iconoclasm, but these are
usually presented as marginal excesses, or understandable instances of popular
fury against church abuses. Once we get those unfortunate riots out of the way,
we can get back to the main story of tracing the process of Bible translation.
That’s
very misleading. For anyone living at the time, including educated elites, the
iconoclasm was not just an incidental breakdown of law and order, it was the
core of the whole movement, the necessary other side of the coin to the growth
of literacy. . . .
Source: Philip Jenkins, ‘The Breaking of Images’, Patheos, http://www.pravoslavie.ru/english/72449.htm,
posted 23 July 2014, accessed 10 Nov. 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment