There
has been some good commentary lately on the fifteen years of lies the States
and the world have been subjected to regarding 9/11:
One
of the best ensamples of the fraud surrounding the attacks, however, comes from
a 10 Aug. 2004 article about the cell phone calls supposedly made from the
hijacked planes that morning:
The 9/11
Commission’s Report provides an almost visual description of the Arab
hijackers. It depicts in minute detail events occurring inside the cabin of the
four hijacked planes.
In the absence of surviving passengers, this “corroborating evidence”,
was based on passengers’ cell and air phone conversations with their loved
ones. According to the
Report, the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) was only recovered in the case of one
of the flights (UAL 93).
Focusing
on the personal drama of the passengers, the Commission has built much of its
narrative around the phone conversations. The Arabs are portrayed with
their knives and box cutters, scheming in the name of Allah, to bring down the
planes and turn them “into large guided missiles” (Report, Chapter 1, http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.pdf ).
The Technology of Wireless Transmission
The Report conveys the impression that cell phone ground-to-air communication
from high altitude was of reasonably good quality, and that there was no major impediment or
obstruction in wireless transmission.
Some
of the conversations were with onboard air phones, which contrary to the cell
phones provide for good quality transmission. The report does not draw a
clear demarcation between the two types of calls.
More
significantly, what this
carefully drafted script fails to mention is that, given the prevailing
technology in September 2001, it was extremely difficult, if not impossible, to
place a wireless cell call from an aircraft traveling at high speed above 8000
feet:
“Wireless
communications networks weren’t designed for ground-to-air
communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they’re surprised the
calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as
long as they did. They speculate that the only reason that the calls went
through in the first place is that the aircraft were flying so close to the
ground
Expert
opinion within the wireless telecom industry casts serious doubt on “the
findings” of the 9/11 Commission. According to Alexa Graf, a spokesman of
AT&T, commenting in the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks:
“it
was almost a fluke that the [9/11] calls reached their destinations… From high
altitudes, the call quality is not very good, and most callers will experience
drops. Although calls are not reliable, callers can pick up and hold calls
for a little while below a certain altitude”
New Wireless Technology
While
serious doubts regarding the cell calls were expressed in the immediate
aftermath of 9/11, a new landmark in the wireless telecom industry has further
contributed to upsetting the Commission’s credibility. Within days of the
release of the 9/11 Commission Report in July, American Airlines and
Qualcomm, proudly announced the development of a new wireless
technology –which will at some future date allow airline passengers
using their cell phones to contact family and friends from a commercial
aircraft (no doubt at a special rate aerial roaming charge)
“Travelers
could be talking on their personal cellphones as early as 2006. Earlier this
month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run on a modified
aircraft that permitted cell phone calls.” (WP, July 27, 2004)
Aviation Week (07/20/04)
described this new technology in an authoritative report published in July
2004:
“Qualcomm
and American Airlines are exploring [July 2004] ways for passengers to use
commercial cell phones inflight for air-to-ground communication. In a recent
2-hr. proof-of-concept flight, representatives from government and the media
used commercial Code
Division Multiple Access (CDMA) third-generation cell phones to place
and receive calls and text messages from friends on the ground.
For
the test flight from Dallas-Fort Worth, the aircraft was equipped with an
antenna in the front and rear of the cabin to transmit cell phone calls to a
small in-cabin CDMA cellular base station. This “pico cell” transmitted cell
phone calls from the aircraft via a Globalstar satellite to the worldwide
terrestrial phone network”
Needless
to say, neither the service, nor the “third generation” hardware, nor the
“Picco cell” CDMA base
station inside the cabin (which so to speak mimics a cell phone communication
tower inside the plane) were available on the morning of September 11, 2001.
The
911 Commission points to the clarity and detail of these telephone
conversations.
In
substance, the Aviation Week report
creates yet another embarrassing hitch in the official story.
The
untimely July American Airlines / Qualcomm announcement acted as a cold shower.
Barely acknowledged in press reports, it confirmed that the Bush administration
had embroidered the cell phone narrative (similar to what they did with WMDs) and
that the 9/11 Commission’s account was either flawed or grossly exaggerated.
Altitude and Cellphone Transmission
According
to industry experts, the crucial link in wireless cell phone transmission from
an aircraft is altitude. Beyond a
certain altitude which is usually reached within a few minutes after takeoff,
cell phone calls are no longer possible.
In other words, given the wireless technology available on
September 11 2001, these cell calls could not have been placed from high
altitude.
The
only way passengers could have got through to family and friends using their
cell phones, is if the planes were flying below 8000 feet. Yet even at low
altitude, below 8000 feet, cell phone communication is of poor quality.
The
crucial question: at what altitude were the planes traveling, when the calls
were placed?
While
the information provided by the Commission is scanty, the Report’s timeline
does not suggest that the planes were consistently traveling at low altitude.
In fact the Report confirms that a fair number of the cell phone calls were
placed while the plane was traveling at altitudes above 8000 feet, which is
considered as the cutoff altitude for cell phone transmission.
. . .
Concluding Remarks
A
large part of the description, regarding the 19 hijackers relies on cell phone
conversations with family and friends.
While
a few of these calls (placed at low altitude) could have got through, the
wireless technology was not available. On this issue, expert opinion within the
wireless telecom industry is unequivocal.
In other words, at least part of the Commission’s script in Chapter 1
on the cell phone conversations, is fabricated.
According
to the American Airline / Qualcomm [2004] announcement, the technology for cell
phone transmission at high altitude will only be available aboard commercial
aircraft in 2006. This is an inescapable fact.
In
the eyes of public opinion, the cell phone conversations on the Arab hijackers
is needed to sustain the illusion that America is under attack.
The
“war on terrorism” underlying the National Security doctrine relies on real
time “evidence” concerning the Arab hijackers. The latter personify, so to
speak, this illusive “outside enemy” (Al Qaeda), which is threatening the
homeland.
Embodied into the Commission’s “script” of 911, the narrative of what
happened on the plane with the Arab hijackers is therefore crucial. It is an
integral part of the Administration’s disinformation and propaganda program. It constitutes a justification for the anti-terror
legislation under the Patriot acts and the waging of America’s
pre-emptive wars against Afghanistan
and Iraq.
Note:
Emphasis added in bold font.
Source: Prof
Michel Chossudovsky, http://www.globalresearch.ca/what-happened-on-the-planes-on-september-11-2001-the-911-commission-script-was-fabricated/5428771,
accessed 13 Sept. 2016
We
have left out from this long quote the review of some of the calls made that
morning by Prof Michel, but all are welcome to view that information at the
site linked just above. We will, though,
include a short critique of the Todd Beamer call from Flight 93 because it has
provided such a key bit of mind-control used by the elite on those in the States,
the famous ‘Let’s roll’ line:
A key element of the official 9/11 story is the
phone call Todd Beamer made from United Airlines Flight 93 shortly before it
supposedly crashed in rural Pennsylvania.
It was at the end of this call that Beamer was heard declaring: "Let's
roll," before joining a passenger revolt against the terrorists. Without
this now-famous call to battle, 9/11 would arguably have been less effective in
motivating the public to get behind the war on terror. By May 2002, the Washington Post reported, Beamer's
phrase "Let's roll" had been "Embraced and promoted by President
Bush as a patriotic battle cry," and was "now emblazoned on Air Force
fighter planes, city firetrucks, school athletic jerseys, and countless
T-shirts, baseball caps and souvenir buttons. It's also commemorated in popular
songs." [1] The London Evening Standard called Beamer's final
words "a symbol of America's
determination to fight back." [2] Rowland Morgan, author of the book Flight 93 Revealed, concluded:
"Truly, the Let's Roll slogan had become a call to arms--just at a time
the White House needed it most." [3] Yet, an examination of Todd Beamer's
phone call reveals numerous oddities, coincidences, and seeming
impossibilities.
. . .
The first thing that was odd about this call is the
simple fact that Beamer was able to talk to Jefferson
continuously for 13 minutes. In her 2002 book, his wife Lisa Beamer revealed
that Jefferson had informed her "it was a
miracle that Todd's call hadn't been disconnected." The reason:
"Because of the enormous number of calls that day, the GTE systems
overloaded and lines were being disconnected all around her as she sat at the
operator's station outside of Chicago,
talking to Todd. [Jefferson] kept thinking, This call is going to get dropped! Yet
Todd stayed connected ... all the way to the end." [5] Very fortunate
indeed this was, because if the call had become disconnected there would have
been no "Let's roll" slogan for the war on terror.
A further oddity was Todd Beamer's remarkable calmness, despite the catastrophic situation he was in. Jefferson recalled: "Todd, when he came to me, he was calm. ... [H]e stayed calm through the entire conversation." [6] In her 2006 book, Called, Jefferson wrote: "[H]is voice was devoid of any stress. In fact, he sounded so tranquil it made me begin to doubt the authenticity and urgency of his call." [7] She told Beamer's wife: "If I hadn't known it was a real hijacking, I'd have thought it was a crank call, because Todd was so rational and methodical about what he was doing." [8]
A further oddity was Todd Beamer's remarkable calmness, despite the catastrophic situation he was in. Jefferson recalled: "Todd, when he came to me, he was calm. ... [H]e stayed calm through the entire conversation." [6] In her 2006 book, Called, Jefferson wrote: "[H]is voice was devoid of any stress. In fact, he sounded so tranquil it made me begin to doubt the authenticity and urgency of his call." [7] She told Beamer's wife: "If I hadn't known it was a real hijacking, I'd have thought it was a crank call, because Todd was so rational and methodical about what he was doing." [8]
. . .
Perhaps the oddest aspect of the call is what
happened after 9:58, when Todd Beamer put the phone down to join the passenger
revolt against the hijackers. Jefferson has
recalled: "After he said, 'Let's roll,' he left the phone, and I would
assume that's at the point that they went to charge the cockpit. And I was
still on the line and the plane took a dive, and by then, it just went silent.
I held on until after the plane crashed--probably about 15 minutes longer and I
never heard a crash--it just went silent because--I can't explain it. We didn't
lose a connection because there's a different sound that you use. It's a
squealing sound when you lose a connection. I never lost connection, but it
just went silent." [18]
Now how is this possible? Firstly, how could the call have remained connected after the plane crashed? According to the summary of passenger phone calls presented at the Moussaoui trial, Beamer's call lasted "3,925 seconds." [19] This would mean it did not end until 10:49 a.m., about three-quarters of an hour after Flight 93 supposedly crashed. And, secondly, how could there have been silence when the crash occurred?
Now how is this possible? Firstly, how could the call have remained connected after the plane crashed? According to the summary of passenger phone calls presented at the Moussaoui trial, Beamer's call lasted "3,925 seconds." [19] This would mean it did not end until 10:49 a.m., about three-quarters of an hour after Flight 93 supposedly crashed. And, secondly, how could there have been silence when the crash occurred?
. . .
Source: http://shoestring911.blogspot.ru/2007/10/todd-beamers-odd-phone-call-and-silent.html,
accessed 13 Sept. 2016
Dixie and all the world continue to be in great danger from this program
begun on 11 Sept. 2001 for the ‘globalization of war’ (Prof Michel). But it is always a good idea to see what
God’s providence has wrought on infamous days like these in the Church’s
history for our salvation. And as the
Lord so ordained it, His holy servant, St Silouan the Athonite, one of the
great saints of the 20th hundredyear, forthfared on 11 Sept. 1938. It is he who heard the life-giving words from
our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, when He appeared to St Silouan, ‘Keep thy mind
in hell, and despair not’. Their
importance for us as we consider all the evils going on in the world today is
described below by Archimandrite Zacharias, a disciple of St Silouan’s
disciple, Elder Sophrony of Essex:
St. Silouan’s word truly expresses a great
spiritual science, the only one which can effectively oppose the all-destroying
corruption and devastation, apocalyptically being perpetrated in these last
times by the spirit of wickedness.
Through the greater pain of voluntary self-condemnation to hell, and by
virtue of the Lord’s commandment, the believer can triumph over every other
pain and temptation, and prove the love of Christ to be stronger than death, as
is He who “conquered death by death”. Whatever
is done willingly and in fulfilment of a commandment of God is inspired by
divine wisdom, and leads to eternal victory.
This victory renders man above this world, like unto Christ, who, by His
extreme humility, overcame the world (cf.
John 16:33).
. . . we
must choose either to live in order to die or to die in order to live (cf. Matt. 10:39).
Source: The Enlargement of the Heart, 2nd
ed., C. Veniamin, ed., Dalton,
Pa.: Mount Thabor Publishing, 2012, p. 83.
In
all our efforts to free ourselves from thralldom to the satanic banking and
corporate elite, let us not forget the wisdom of St Silouan and all the
saints. Without it, all those efforts
are doomed to failure in the long run.
(From
https://orthodoxwiki.org/File:Silouanicon.jpg,
accessed 13 Sept. 2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment