Most
likely, some arm of the military-industrial complex:
. . .
In
the midst of the media’s sudden headline-blaring apoplexy over fake news, you
won’t hear much about the government’s role in producing, planting and peddling
propaganda-driven fake news – often
with the help of the corporate news media – because that’s not how the game
works.
Why?
Because
the powers-that-be don’t want us skeptical of the government’s message or its corporate accomplices
in the mainstream media. They don’t want us to be more discerning when it
comes to what information we digest online. They just want
us to be leery of independent or alternative
news sources while trusting them – and their corporate colleagues – to vet
the news for us.
Indeed,
the New York Times has suggested that
Facebook and Google appoint themselves the arbiters of truth on the Internet
in order to screen out what is blatantly false, spam or click-baity.
Not
only would this establish a dangerous precedent for all-out censorship by
corporate entities known for colluding with the government but it’s also a slick
sleight-of-hand maneuver that diverts attention from what we should really be
talking about: the fact that the government
has grown dangerously out-of-control, all the while the so-called
mainstream news media, which is supposed to act as a bulwark against government
propaganda, has instead become the mouthpiece of the world’s largest
corporation – the US government.
As
veteran journalist Carl Bernstein, who along with Bob Woodward blew the lid off
the Watergate scandal, reported in his expansive 1977 Rolling Stone piece, “The CIA and the
Media”:
“More
than 400 American journalists … in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried
out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency… There was cooperation,
accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine
services… Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their
staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished
reporters… In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to
perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s
leading news organizations.”
Bernstein
is referring to Operation Mockingbird, a CIA campaign started in the 1950s to
plant intelligence reports among reporters at more than 25 major newspapers and
wire agencies, who would then regurgitate them for a public oblivious to the
fact that they were being fed government propaganda.
In
some instances, as Bernstein shows,
members of the media also served as extensions of the surveillance state, with
reporters actually carrying out assignments for the CIA.
Executives
with CBS, the New York Times
and Time magazine also worked
closely with the CIA to vet the news. Bernstein writes:
“Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American
Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press,
United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual
Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald
and the old Saturday Evening Post
and New York Herald‑Tribune.”
For
example, in August 1964, the nation’s leading newspapers – including the Washington Post and New York Times – echoed Lyndon
Johnson’s claim that North Vietnam
had launched a second round of attacks against American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin. No such attacks had taken place,
and yet the damage was done. As Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon report for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting,
“By reporting official claims as absolute truths, American journalism opened
the floodgates for the bloody Vietnam War.”
Fast
forward to the early post-9/11 years when, despite a lack of any credible data
supporting the existence of weapons of mass destruction, the mainstream media
jumped on the bandwagon to sound the war drums against Iraq. As Los
Angeles
Timescolumnist Robin Abcarian put it, “our government … used
its immense bully pulpit to steamroll the watchdogs… Many were gulled by
access to administration insiders, or susceptible to the drumbeat of the
government’s coordinated rhetoric.”
John
Walcott, Washington bureau chief for
Knight-Ridder, one of the only news agencies to challenge the government’s
rationale for invading Iraq,
suggests that the reason for the media’s easy acceptance is that “too many
journalists, including some very famous ones, have surrendered
their independence in order to become part of the ruling class. Journalism
is, as the motto goes, speaking truth to power, not wielding it.”
If
it was happening then, you can bet it’s still happening today, only
it’s been reclassified, renamed and hidden behind layers of government secrecy,
obfuscation and spin.
In
its article, “How the American government is trying to control what you think,”
the Washington Post points
out “Government agencies historically have made a habit of crossing the
blurry line between informing the public and propagandizing.”
Thus,
whether you’re talking about the Cold War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the
government’s invasion of Iraq based
upon absolute fabrications, or the government’s so-called war on terror,
privacy and whistleblowers, it’s
being driven by propagandachurned out by one corporate machine (the
corporate-controlled government) and fed to the American people by way of yet
another corporate machine (the corporate-controlled media).
“For
the first time in human history, there is a concerted strategy to manipulate
global perception. And the mass media are operating as its compliant
assistants, failing both to resist it and to expose it,” writes
investigative journalist Nick Davies. “The sheer ease with which this
machinery has been able to do its work reflects a creeping structural weakness
which now afflicts the production of our news.”
But
wait.
If
the mass media – aka the mainstream media or the corporate or establishment
media – is merely repeating what is being fed to it, who are the masterminds
within the government responsible for this propaganda?
Davies
explains:
The
Pentagon has now designated “information operations” as its fifth “core
competency” alongside land, sea, air and special forces. Since October 2006,
every brigade, division and corps in the US military has had its own “psyop”
element producing output for local media. This military activity is linked to
the State Department’s campaign of “public diplomacy” which includes funding
radio stations and news websites.
This
use of propaganda disguised as journalism is what journalist John Pilger refers
to as “invisible government… the true ruling power of our country.”
. . .
Source: John
W. Whitehead, http://anotherdayintheempire.com/comes-fake-news-us-government-biggest-culprit/,
opened 6 Dec. 2016
--
Holy
Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the
Souð!
Anathema
to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment