The
connection between Big Pharma’s mRNA covid shots and devastating side effects
like heart damage and blot clots is becoming widely known, so the revelation
that pork producers have been using mRNA swine flu shots on their animals since
2018 should concern everyone.
The amount
of safety testing for this ‘vaccine’ was negligible, and the results from the
testing that was done were abysmal. Dr.
Joseph Mercola reports,
So, just what
kind of safety testing has been done on these mRNA swine jabs? As it turns out,
not much, and even saying that would be an exaggeration. Looking at the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) summary of studies supporting the product
licensure of Sequivity,7 we find only ONE safety study listed.
There are two
efficacy studies pertaining to H1N1 swine influenza, two efficacy studies
pertaining to H1N2 swine influenza, one efficacy study pertaining to H3N2 swine
influenza, and one safety study pertaining to all vaccines under “typical use
conditions.”
These six studies
were all performed between June 2020 and December 2021. A search of the USDA’s
Licensed Veterinary Biological Products catalog renders just this one summary
of studies to support Sequivity’s licensure.8 This implies the
platform was approved by the USDA based on these data alone.
While that’s
concerning enough, it becomes even more questionable when you consider the side
effects summary. The study involved a total of 748 pigs at three different
testing sites, which were given two doses of an unspecified mRNA Sequivity
injection three weeks apart. The piglets were monitored for side effects for 21
days after each injection, or until the side effect was resolved.
According to the
USDA summary, 525 piglets — 70.2% — experienced no adverse events. However,
among the remaining 29.8%, 7.4% became anorexic, 3.2% died, 2.7% became lame,
0.4% suffered anaphylaxis, 0.4% had some sort of central nervous system
disorder, 0.3% developed meningitis and another 0.3% some form of
musculoskeletal disorder. . . .
In all, 223 out of 748 piglets — nearly 30%
— had some form of adverse event, including 24 deaths. How on earth is that
even remotely considered safe? If 3 in 10 people suffered a serious side effect
from a particular drug, and over 3% dropped dead immediately and 11.5% in the
long run, would you consider it safe? Would you risk taking it? I sure
wouldn’t.
Also consider
this. Anorexia is basically considered a wasting disease. “Unthrifty” is
similar in that it’s the failure to grow or develop normally due to disease.
Either way, whether the piglet is wasting or failing to grow, it’s a loss for
the farmer. Now, when we add together death, anorexia and unthrifty, you end up
with 86 animals — 11.5%.
Losing 11.5% of
your herd to vaccine death, wasting and failure to thrive really doesn’t make
sense. That’s a loss of more than 1 out of 10 animals, which hardly speaks to
either safety or effectiveness. Moreover, there are no safety studies at all
related to human consumption of Sequivity-treated animals.
The
all-important question now is whether this mRNA-injected swine meat is safe to
eat. Dr. Mercola’s thoughts are not
comforting:
. . .
The rest is
at https://thehayride.com/2023/05/garlington-is-there-mrna-in-your-bacon/.
--
Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us
sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment