The official
narrative surrounding covid that the Establishment has been pushing is nearing
its final collapse. In recent testimony
before the US Senate, the former CDC director has
admitted truths that heretofore were being labelled as ‘conspiracy
theories’:
Former Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the
dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling
them “toxic”
and saying they should never have been mandated.
Redfield’s
admissions came during a
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on
government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research.
The late
admission of vaccine injuries underscores the failure of public
health agencies and the medical establishment to provide informed consent
to the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide.
“It’s important
that he is telling the truth now,” vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D., told The Defender. “Adverse
events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.”
Redfield, who led
the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He declared biosecurity “our
nation’s greatest national security threat,” calling for a halt to
gain-of-function research pending further debate.
The hearing,
which featured contentious exchanges between senators and witnesses, also
touched on controversial topics such as the COVID-19
origins lab-leak theory and allegations that health agencies suppressed data.
During the
hearing Redfield,
who oversaw the CDC during the crucial early months of the COVID-19
pandemic, elaborated on his recent statements about mRNA vaccine safety.
“I do think one
of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was
mandating these vaccines,” Redfield said. “They should have never been
mandated. It should have been open to personal choice.”
Redfield went
further, admitting that the
spike protein produced by
mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong
pro-inflammatory response.”
He noted that in
his own medical practice, he doesn’t administer mRNA vaccines, preferring “killed
protein vaccines” instead.
Redfield’s
statements stand in stark contrast to the CDC’s
official stance during his tenure, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccine
uptake as safe and effective.
The Elite
made a major move with the covid epidemic to try to consolidate power. Thankfully much of their effort is failing. As a result of it all, a great many people
have had their eyes opened to the falsehoods they had previously accepted as
truths. Jeff LeJeune has spoken of this
process quite a bit lately:
Americans, whether we choose to partake in the battle or not, are entrenched in an information war that is seeing the illusory framework of church and state crumbling more and more by the week. . . . a growing number of dramatic examples–as fictional character Bruce Wayne puts it in the Dark Knight film series–that periodically pops up amidst the slower breadcrumbing of truth in a seemingly orchestrated process that is systematically waking up the world.
One more
important line from
him: ‘We are living in a most
unbelievable shatterpoint in human history . . . .’
Indeed. And what if part of that illusory framework
of church and state that the current shatterpoint is breaking apart is the
current federal constitution itself?
You see, it
is not just the current group of Elites that manipulated things to their
liking. Such actions by such groups have
existed throughout history. And one of
them in the US used an uprising called Shays’ Rebellion in Massachusetts to
scare the States into ratifying the current federal constitution:
“Never let a good crisis go to waste” isn’t just some modern
invention by people who want to expand government power. It seems to be an
approach used to convince people of the need to replace the Articles of
Confederation with a new Constitution in 1787.
Even James Madison admitted as much later in life.
Shays’ Rebellion was one of the most prominent reasons given for a
system of government more “energetic” than the one formed under the Articles. Federalists,
who had for years failed to expand congressional power under the Articles,
repeatedly cited the Shays’ crisis as a glaring example of the weakness and
insufficiency of the system – and a reason for a new one.
For instance, in a 1787 letter to William Carmichael, John Jay asserted that the rebellion and the federal
government’s inability to fund troops to put down the uprising made “the
Inefficiency of the fœderal government [become] more and more manifest.”
In a 1786 letter to Henry Lee,
George Washington described the rebellion as “clouds that have spread
over the brightest morn that ever dawned upon any Country.”
“You talk, my good Sir, of employing influence to appease the
present tumults in Massachusetts. I know not where that influence is to be
found; and if attainable, that it would be a proper remedy for the disorders.
Influence is no Government. Let us have one by which our lives, liberties and
properties will be secured; or let us know the worst at once.”
However, as prominent Anti-Federalists warned, there is evidence
that supporters of a strong centralized government were merely using and even
hyping Shays’ Rebellion in order to achieve their goals of more centralized
power.
. .
. In 1821, James Madison went so far as to admit that Shays’
Rebellion was overblown and resulted in a more powerful government than what
was “warranted.”
In a letter to John G. Jackson,
Madison wrote, “most of us carried into the Convention profound impressions,
produced by the experienced inadequacy of the old Confederation, & by the
monitory examples of all similar ones antient and modern, as to the necessity
of binding the States together by a strong Constitution.”
Madison specifically mentioned the “alarming insurrection” led
by Shays, writing that it had “a very sensible influence on the public mind.”
“Such indeed was the aspect of things, that in the eyes of the
best friends of liberty, a crisis had arrived.”
But Madison went on to admit that, “This view of the
crisis made it natural for many in the Convention to lean to a higher
toned system than was perhaps in strictness warranted by a proper
distinction between causes temporary as some of them doubtless were, and causes
permanently inherent in popular frames of Government.” [Emphasis
added]
Deceit and
manipulation of the peoples of the States by their Elite bookend the early
years of the United States and now her latter years. Just as covid restrictions weren’t rolled out
to protect us from a virus, but to make us more subservient to a degenerate
oligarchy, so it was with the Philadelphia constitution of 1787: It wasn’t meant to safeguard the
centuries-old English liberties of the plainfolk that had been handed down
generation after generation; it was meant to limit them by placing them under
the control of a powerful central government run by the Elite cliques of the
time. You have just read their own
admission of that.
This being
so, we owe an apology to two groups in US history. The first is the (misnamed) Anti-Federalists,
the opponents of the ratification of the Philadelphia constitution. They foresaw many of the dangers arising from
it which we are now dealing with. The
second group is the Southerners who seceded from the union in 1860-1. Like the Anti-Federalists, they saw well
enough that the current federal constitution and government were taking the union
in a tyrannical direction, and they were none too pleased with that. So they did something about it: They seceded from the union, just like their
forefathers had in 1776 from the British union.
Jefferson Davis lays out some of their reasoning
as follows:
. . .
The rest is
at https://thehayride.com/2024/07/garlington-unraveling-false-narratives-covid-and-constitution/.
--
Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us
sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment