For many –
including the MSM, academia, the ‘scientific community’, etc. – the answer to
that question is of course human activities like burning hydrocarbons, growing
crops, and raising livestock. All of
this releases dangerous levels, in their view, of greenhouse gases (especially
carbon dioxide) into the atmosphere, which in turn trap heat from the sun,
causing catastrophic global warming/climate change.
But a
dispassionate analysis of the data shows that greenhouse gases are not
supercharging a rapid, dangerous change of the world’s climate. A new
report illustrates this yet again:
Popular claims that CO2 changes drive
temperature changes currently or throughout the distant past “are based on
imagination and climate models full of assumptions.”
A comprehensive new study details a
stochastic assessment determination of the sequencing of CO2 variations versus
temperature variations since the 1950s, over the last 2,000 years (the Common
Era), and throughout the last 541 million years.
The robust conclusion is that the causality
direction – with the understanding that causes lead and effects lag – clearly
shows the temperature changes lead and CO2 changes lag on yearly, decadal, and
centennial/millennial scales. In other words, “the reverse causality direction
[CO2]→T should be excluded.”
The claim that CO2 increases drive
temperature changes is thus a “narrative” only, as the claim that “humans,
through their emissions by fossil fuel burning, are responsible for the changes
we see in climate” can be regarded as a “non-scientific issue.”
. . .
The rest is
at https://thehayride.com/2024/07/garlington-what-is-driving-climate-change/.
--
Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us
sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment