The rushed passage of
cringe-inducing federal omnibus spending bills just before Christmas is fast
becoming the third certainty in US life, along with death and taxes. The 2024 version has arrived with plenty of
things to make folks irate, like its 1,500 pages bursting with billions in
‘emergency spending’ and its pay raises for Congress critters, which would make
their salary about $180,000 per year (Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking,
‘Government funding plan collapses as Trump makes new demands days before shutdown’,
apnews.com).
Such things were predicted by
the Anti-Federalists during the ratification debates in the States from
1787-8. Patrick Henry of Virginia put
his finger precisely on the pay raise issue:
‘ . . . at the Virginia
ratifying convention in June 1788, Patrick Henry, an Anti-Federalist and
staunch opponent of ratifying the Constitution, objected to allowing Members of
Congress to determine their compensation by themselves, without limitation or
restraint.3
He stated that Members may therefore indulge themselves in the fullest extent
by making their compensation as high as they please.4
Henry argued that having the state legislatures fix Members’ compensation would
impose some measure of restraint on the national legislature5’
(‘Amdt27.2.3 Congressional Compensation and Debates over Ratification of the
Constitution’, constitution.congress.gov).
Mr Henry’s solution - giving
the State governments more power over the federal government - is one we need
to seriously consider in our time of irresponsible behavior by the federal
congress, which, as most folks know by now, has racked up an astronomical debt
of $35 trillion, with no signs of slowing down.
We will touch briefly on two simple ways this could be done, (1) by
making the State governments responsible for setting the salaries for federal
congressmen and senators and for paying those salaries, and (2) by allowing the
federal government the power to raise only part of the revenue needed for the
federal budget, with the other part being provided voluntarily by the State
governments.
It doesn’t take an overly
active imagination to see how these proposals would bring beneficial changes to
the current chaotic situation. The
States’ ability to check detrimental federal actions via written constitutional
provisions is currently non-existent.
There is the unwritten provision of State nullification (grounded in the
10th Amendment of the federal charter), but that is most effective
against federal laws and regulations and rulings that violate specific
long-standing customs, rights, etc. It can
do little to affect the federal budget.
But give State legislatures
the recommended powers, and things could change dramatically. They would have the ability to affect the
budget process in DC very directly. If
federal legislators continued to raise the debt/spending level in spite of
warnings not to, the State governments could simply withhold the pay of the
federal congressmen until the fever of the latter for deficit spending
subsided. Likewise, if the federal
government had to ask the State legislatures to provide funding for its budget,
the States could refuse to comply until any troublesome items in the budget
were addressed.
The Federalists who supported
the ratification of the current federal constitution were concerned that the
States would have too much influence upon the federal government, preventing it
from operating with the robustness they thought necessary. They were wrong; the opposite has
happened. It is actually the
Anti-Federalists whose fears have come to pass:
that the federal government would become an overbearing menace to the
States, trampling on the individual sovereignty and uniqueness of each one and
consolidating them into one dull, uniform despotism ruled from DC.
Cato (George Mason) offered
some representative warnings:
. . .
The rest is at https://thehayride.com/2024/12/garlington-another-bloated-omnibus-bill-shows-need-to-restructure-fedgov/.
--
Holy
Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema
to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment