Friday, August 2, 2019

What Awaits in ‘Tales of the Abyss’


Tales of the Abyss, a role-playing game for Sony’s PS2 and later for Nintendo’s 3DS handheld, has some inward and outer aspects that ought to be highlighted.

Outwardly, it is a garden of delights for men who share Nietzsche’s view of things.  The main story revolves around the determination of a group of men and women led by a fellow named Van to stamp out the ruling religious orthodoxy of the planet, which involves following to the letter a prophetic utterance called Yulia’s Score, which is described in the game as the collective memory of all the people of the world.  It is therefore not a stretch to say that the Score is a symbol of an all-knowing, providential God. 

There is a rather clear message put forward by this game’s writers about those who defend religious orthodoxy:  They are monsters.  Grand Maestro Mohs is so determined to see the Score followed that it leads to his transformation into a hideous creature that lacks even basic rationality.

On the other hand, those who try to overturn the Score and replace it with human will, whether the extreme of Van and his group who want to destroy it utterly or the milder form of relativism (the Score can continue to exist, but we don’t have to follow it to the letter) of Luke and his allies - all of these are presented with a certain air of compassion and nobility of soul.

It is interesting to note the meanings associated with the name of the hero, Luke.  On the one hand there is the association with the Apostle and Evangelist Luke, the physician, and thus with healing.  And that element of healing is present to a degree with Luke in this game.  But more deeply, Luke means ‘light’ (http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Luke.html), which carries with it the association with Lucifer, the bright and morning star who fell from Heaven with the demons.  Given that he and his friends bring an end to the religious orthodoxy of the Score, the Luciferian seems to be Luke’s true nature in TotA.  As if to leave us with no doubts on this point, the game’s creators emblazoned a demonic image on the back of Luke’s clothing that the player sees over and over again:


Such a worldview is very Nietzschean in its orientation:  Let us kill God and become gods in His place; this is the message to all the gamers who sink dozens of hours into this RPG.

Inwardly, Tales of the Abyss is an initiation into Kaballah.  Many of the game’s pieces are taken straight from that cult.  The outer lands are supported by Sephiroth Trees, a sephiroth being one of the ten different nodes or spheres found on Kaballah’s ‘Tree of Life’, which also has its own supporting columns:


Some of the place-names in this game are the same as (or slight modifications of) Kaballah’s sephira:  Chokmah, Daath, Malkuth, and others.  The space beneath the Outer Lands, the Qliphoth, is also a Kabbalistic term, signifying a land of darkness/evil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qliphoth).  And the word ‘abyss’ from the very title of the game, is the void sundering unpurified man from the ‘supernal triad’ in the Kabbalistic system: 


The dividing of Luke into two, into Luke and Asch, is also borrowed from Kaballah:

     'Adam Kadmon is Primal Man, the Heavenly Adam, the Original Man. In the strictest sense he is the emanation of the Divine in Atziluth (the World of Emanation, see below), but he also radiates in the other three Worlds. It is man as he originally was, and actually still is although he does not realize it anymore, because his consciousness has split. Part of him is still close to the Divine, while the other part is here on earth. That is why it is said that he has two faces.'


We do not think anyone would be far wrong in saying that the game involves to a great degree the ascent of Luke up the Tree of Life, from the darkness of the lowly physical passions of Malkuth (his anger and selfishness, etc.) to the exalted spiritual light and life of Kether (acquiring love and self-sacrifice for others), i.e., his transformation into Adam Kadmon.

It is also worth noting that in the Qliphoth there is a group called the Watchers who guide the events of the Outer Lands according to Yulia’s Score.  This is akin to the shadowy groups like the Aspen Institute, the Council on Foreign Relations, and others who, while remaining in the background, are guiding events in this world according to a predetermined globalist agenda.

There also appears to be some influence from Aleister Crowley in this game.  Ion, who is the acknowledged spiritual and political head of the world, is only a boy.  This is very much in the spirit of Crowley’s ‘crowned and conquering child’ whom he envisioned would reign in the post-Christian era he tried so hard to inaugurate.  With the Orthodox Empire overthrown and the Orthodox Church weakened by internal and external trials, we have seen that vision partially fulfilled, as youth worship pervades the cultures of the States, Japan, South Korea, and so on.

And there is also an interesting link between this game and the movie Goonies via the name of Astor.  In TotA, Astor is the leader of the merchants’ guild in Chesedonia, the Center of Trade (https://aselia.fandom.com/wiki/Chesedonia), and who always comes off as very creepy.  There is good reason for that, as he shares his name with John Jacob Astor.  Jay Dyer explains about John Jacob:

The other interesting fact about the choice of “Astoria” is that it is named after the United States’ first multi-millionaire family, from John Jacob Astor.  Astor achieved a monopoly in the fur trade, but more was at work here: Astor was master of Lodge No. 8, “Astor was a Freemason, and served as Master of Holland Lodge #8, New York City in 1788. Later he served as Grand Treasurer for the Grand Lodge of New York.”  In other words, he was already well-connected, prior to his supposed rise to wealth, and these connections likely enabled his monopoly.  Another path to his wealth was drug trafficking – particularly opium, which would make his pedigree as a masonic bonesman even more likely – a pirate.  

Keeping in mind these are the same Eastern establishment Anglo-elites (though here we mean West Coast), John Coleman explains:

“John Jacob Astor made a huge fortune out of the China opium trade …. it was the Committee of 300 who chose who would be allowed to participate in the fabulously lucrative China opium trade, through its monopolistic British East India Company, and the beneficiaries of their largess remained forever wedded to the Committee of 300.”

Fritz Springmeier writes:

“One result of his fur company, was that Astoria, OR was created. Today, perhaps in honor of the family that originally took interest in it, Astoria is a hot-bed for the secret Satanic covens in Oregon. John Jacob Astor did have a few helpful connections. Three of his relatives were captains on clipper ships, and he had connections in London to the Blackhouse family. He married a Todd, a family frequently associated with Satanism. His wife, a Todd, was also connected to the influential Brevoort family. And finally for some reason, John Jacob Astor maintained good relations with the politicians of the day, perhaps because most of them were Freemasons, too.”


Both Astors being involved in trade and such is very coincidental and makes us suspect that the Tales creators were inspired in some way by the Oregon Astor.

Things to Come

One of the uses of studying high-profile games and movies is in seeing what they foreshadow.  The Elite often reveal through them what is in store for the wider public, for the ‘unwashed masses’.  Here are some themes we have seen both in this game and in other games, films, etc.

--Cloning (fomicry) will become commonplace.  At some point, however, they will be abused, but will sacrifice themselves for the ‘originals’ in order to forestall a catastrophe.  In other stories, however (like seaQuest and Star Wars), the clones revolt against their makers.

--Dawn Age technology (fon machines) is much more advanced than later technology in TotA.  This is too common a theme not to see in it some kind of conditioning for a future revelation in this world.  We could be wrong, but its presence is interesting.

--Catastrophe as the great uniter:  Old feuds are put to rest in TotA in light of the various emergencies that unfold during the game’s story.  We in this world are already seeing the beginning of global government proposals to deal with the manufactured crisis of climate change.  Other ‘crises’ will almost certainly be trotted out to give greater urgency for the solution of a single world government.

--The Tower of Rem:  In the Dawn Age of TotA an idea was presented to transport people away from the poisoned and dying world to another world via the Tower of Rem.  This idea of a refugee world is also presented in the space opera Interstellar, reviewed by Jay Dyer here:

It also was the basis of the short-lived TV series Earth 2:

--Planet Storm and the hollow interior of the world:  There may be more going on in the earth’s mantle and core than we have been told by the powers that be.  This theme has been around for quite a while:

--Eldrant:  The appearance of a ‘Glorious Land’, a phony Eden (Atlantis, Shambhala, etc.), may occur to further man’s fall away from God in these last days.

Such is entertainment in the world today.  Caveat emptor.


--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Ministerial to Advance Gnosticism and Globalism


The [u.] S. State Dept. held its second Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom in July, and it trotted out some of the same subversive declarations as the year before:

We call upon all governments to respect the individual’s human right to believe or not believe, to practice any faith tradition or none.


As representatives of the international community, we stand together in support of the interconnected freedoms of thought, conscience, religion or belief, and expression.  We stand in firm opposition to laws that, inconsistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, impede the freedom of individuals to choose a faith, practice a faith, change their religion, not have a religion, tell others about their beliefs and practices, or openly debate and discuss aspects of faith or belief.


How is that subversive, the typical American might ask?  Because at the heart of human life, particularly mankind’s religious life, is not the individual, but both the individual and the community. 

Mankind was made in the image of the Holy Trinity, not the neo-Platonic Monad.  Three unique Persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, live in an inseparable community of self-emptying humility and love without division but also without losing their uniqueness as individual Persons.  This is how mankind is also supposed to live its life, upholding both community and the individual.  To promote one at the expense of the other leads to terrible consequences:  the smothering uniformity of socialism/communism on the one hand and chaotic republics/democracy on the other. 

The interests of both the community and the individual must be upheld in anything we do.  Therefore, when the State Dept. declares that the individual’s right to choose any faith or no faith, etc., must be upheld anywhere and everywhere, this is nothing other than a declaration of its intention to unleash chaos throughout the world.  When the freedom of the individual is made the measuring rod for morality, goodness, progress, and so on, then all communal obligations and institutions will be undermined in the end.  Absolute truth itself will be rejected eventually as each and all make the inner voice of their individual conscience the arbiter of what is right and wrong.

And what is the result of all this?  Globalism.  Mankind, uprooted from any kind of local attachments and duties to Church, family, neighborhood, and the like, will necessarily become a ‘citizen of the world’, where economic concerns and laws become the main guiding force in life:


It is sad to say, but this kind of economic utopianism preached by Milton Friedman in this short video, this substitute church that promises to bring harmony and co-operation to all the peoples of the world, is praised by Protestant Evangelicals, libertarians, and others of a similar cast of mind, but it cannot be otherwise.  Their exaltation of the individual over the community leads inevitably to it.

Thus, it is precisely our fidelity to real community that protects us from globalism.  The concentric rings of authority, obligation, and custom of the various communities mankind has traditionally belonged to once shielded him from the advance of that demonic ideology.  But thanks to efforts like this Ministerial by the State Dept., those protecting walls are being demolished in the name of individual rights.  Unfortunately, this is simply the logical out-working of the American Constitutional Creed. 

It cannot be any plainer, then:  Americanism is Globalism; Americanism is Gnosticism.

Sam Brownback gave a very clear indication of this when he said,

Previewing the event, Sam Brownback, the U.S. government’s ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom, noted that religions of all sorts are vulnerable to persecution.

“Almost every faith that’s a majority somewhere is a minority somewhere else and often gets persecuted where they’re a minority,” Brownback said at a State Department briefing. “So that’s why a big part of our effort is to get the faiths to come together and to stand for each other.”

“We’re not talking common theology here — nobody agrees on theology,” he added. “We’re talking about a common human right.”


Human rights trump correct theology:  This is heretical gobbledy-gook.  But it is exactly what we should expect from the Universal Yankee Empire of America.

For the sake of truth, for the sake of salvation, for the sake of the true flourishing of humanity, we must therefore be bold in saying this:  The confessional state, the established religion, is the norm for any ethnos.  The faith is the country, and the country is its faith.  The individual must affirm his being in community, imitating the Holy Trinity, the angels, and the saints, or experience its dissolution in isolation from others, as Satan, the demons, and all the enemies of God do, and will, for eternity. 

This essay on life in an Orthodox monastery illustrates very well for us what life in a country should look like, how the communal and the individualistic should relate to one another:

In the monastery, the life is a single whole. Not only do we live, work, worship and study together, but we also are welded into one body, in a communion of love. We are called to bear one another’s burdens, be patient, gentle, kind, longsuffering, and forgiving to one another. And in so doing, we not only build the community, but we grow ourselves. It is a long process to enter into an authentic communion of persons, taking years. How we treat one another has direct bearing on how close and integral the life of our community will be, how we will pray together, and how we work together. Community life is very demanding, like a marriage—only with many partners! It exposes our selfishness, our pettiness and passions, our agendas and arrogance, pride and vainglory. It makes us come to terms with ourselves. It is a context in which we work out how to love and be loved, and to elevate that love to a participation in divine Love.

The Fathers have taught us that we are not saved alone. The only thing we do alone is sin, fall, and go to hell. We are saved together, as a single body, the Body of Christ. Our communion here—not only eucharistic participation, but living bond of love—is a participation in the Kingdom of God. The monastic community is an icon of that Body, a small Church. It is a communion of persons, united by one Spirit.

When we sin, we isolate ourselves from God and from one another, from that living unity in Christ. God does not withdraw His grace and His love: rather, we turn away from it, reject it, try to hide—as did Adam and Eve in the garden. The spiritual task is to open ourselves to accept that gift of love and grace, and be transformed by it.

There is always a tension between the corporate life of the community, and the personal life of each member. There is a dynamic of entering in and withdrawing, going deeper and fleeing, participation and hiding. The core of the corporate life of the community is the celebration and participation in the Holy Mysteries, especially the Holy Eucharist. There is always a corporate, communal dimension to our participation, in addition to the personal dimension of our own preparation and entrance into the mystery. The personal dimension, how we each uniquely enter in and contribute to the whole, our personal spiritual life, is the key to this dynamic of sin and repentance, growth in spiritual maturity and regression into rebelliousness, the dark nights of the senses, soul and spirit, and our experience of prayer. Every aspect affects every other aspect, both on the personal as well as the corporate level. How I pray affects how I participate in the liturgy, and either contribute or disrupt the experience of communion and orporate ascent to the Kingdom. My moods, dispositions, sins and transgressions all directly impact how I treat my brothers.

The process of personal spiritual life in monastic context is always shared. We support, rebuke, correct, encourage, build up and scandalize each other regularly.


For a Southland in which participation in the Divine Liturgy and the reception of the Holy Body and Blood of Jesus Christ is the touchstone of her life, both communal and individual, rather than obsession with constitutions, human rights, and the freedom of the individual - let us say again and again with all our heart and with all our soul, Lord have mercy!

As for Americanism, let all pronounce it the accursed heresy that it truly is.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, July 26, 2019

The New Ecstatic Religion of the Extraterrestrial God


Mr William Federer inadvertently reveals to us what may be in store in the near future:  a religious faith centered on encountering ‘God’ in outer space and/or on other planets in ways more powerful than we have experienced Him before:

[Astronaut Alan] Bean continued: “Jim would later say, ‘I was aware on the moon that thousands of people on Earth were praying for the success of our mission. The hours I spent on the moon were the most thrilling of my life. Not because I was there but because I could feel the presence of God. There were times I was filled with new challenges and help from God was immediate.'”

Alan Bean concluded: “Dave and Jim journeyed into space as test pilot astronauts and most of us returned the same way. But Jim changed outwardly. As he explained, ‘I returned determined to share with others that profound experience with God on the moon and lift man into his highest flight of life.'”

Astronaut James Irwin later became an evangelical minister. Of his experience of walking on the moon, he stated: “I felt the power of God as I’d never felt it before.”


Mr Federer often treats statements about religion by anyone from the States as though they came from the mouth of a holy and trustworthy source, but that does not mean we all must do likewise.  The statements by these astronauts are not innocent, harmless professions of personal piety.  As we said in the opening, this is could be the ‘wave of the future’ now that space tourism and exploration are being enthusiastically pursued.  From Montanism to the Pentecostal movement, heresies involving ecstatic religious experiences have troubled the Church.  We would not be at all surprised to see space-focused spiritual gurus joining those ranks.  Be on your guard, and use the tested weapons of the Orthodox Church to ward off these new demonic delusions:

In the town of Phrygia, central Asia Minor, about the year 160AD, a man named Montanus claimed to be “seized” by the Holy Spirit. He began to receive “special” messages, “speak in tongues,” “prophecy,” and so forth. Two women “prophetesses” soon join him: Priscilla and Maximillia.

According to a Charismatic/Emerging Church history scheme, about 300AD generally marks the point when the Church allegedly begins to enter a time of “darkness” (see part one of this series, The Charisma of the Age …https://inklesspen.blog/2019/06/25/the-charisma-of-the-age-an-orthodox-critique-of-the-charismatic-movement/ ). Montanus’ alleged experience of a new and special “anointing in the Holy Spirit” transpired when the Church, even according to Pentecostal-Charismatic (P/C) thought, was still generally “being led by the Spirit.” Thus, for a person subscribing to a modern Charismatic philosophy of history, this incident should bear at least some weight.

The History of the Early Church by Eusebius, one of the first and earliest histories of Christianity, gives these details –

“There is said to be a certain village called  Ardabau in that part of Mysia, which borders upon Phrygia. There first, they say, when Gratus was proconsul of  Asia,  a recent convert, Montanus by name, through his unquenchable desire for leadership, gave the adversary opportunity against him. And he became beside himself, and being suddenly in a sort of frenzy and ecstasy, he raved, and began to babble and utter strange things, prophesying in a manner contrary to the constant custom of the Church handed down by tradition from the beginning … Thus by artifice, or rather by such a system of wicked craft, the devil, devising destruction for the disobedient, and being unworthily honored by them, secretly excited and inflamed their understandings which had already become estranged from the true faith. And he stirred up besides two women, and filled them with the false spirit, so that they talked wildly and unreasonably and strangely, like the person already mentioned. And the spirit pronounced them blessed as they rejoiced and gloried in him, and puffed them up by the magnitude of his promises. But sometimes he rebuked them openly in a wise and faithful manner, that he might seem to be a reprover. But those of the Phrygians that were deceived were few in number … And the arrogant spirit taught them to revile the entire universal Church under heaven, because the spirit of false prophecy received neither honor from it nor entrance into it.”1

The Montanists also declared that they were ushering in “the age of the Holy Spirit,” and with it a supposed renewed focus on prophecy, speaking in tongues, miracles, and the other gifts of the Spirit. The modern Charismatic experience has at its foundation an almost identical claim. The Montanists asserted that to reject their message was “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.”

Let the reader take note of the canon – measuring rod – that the early Church used to discern that the Montanist experience was not consonant with the true Spirit of Christianity: The custom of the Church handed down from the beginning. Why was Montanus susceptible to this new spirit? He had arrogance – an unquenchable desire for leadership – and he allowed his own understanding … (to) become estranged from the true faith. Montanus inevitably used Scripture and a special claim of indwelling by the Holy Spirit to disregard the correcting rebuke of the Church in his time. With his unique “anointing” he was under no obligation to listen to “men.”

The Montanists also prophesied exclusively in the first person, something unheard of in the Old and New Testaments. It appears that Montanus would say, “I, the Holy Spirit, say to you …;” “I, the Lord ….” Whereas the Old and New Testament prophets all spoke in this manner, “Thus says the Lord …” (cf. Act. 21:11; Is. 8:1). They also fervently proclaimed the immediate return of Christ, even professing to know location and date. One author states, the Montanists, “Claiming to receive revelation directly from God that fulfilled and superseded the revelation given to the Apostles, Montanus emphasized direct, ecstatic, and highly emotional spiritual experiences for all believers … (they) did not claim to be messengers of God but rather claimed that God ‘possessed’ them and spoke directly through them.”2

A common claim of novel moves, which assert that they are of the Holy Spirit, is that they have the authority to superseded former Christian revelation with their new experiences. Frequently, the claim is made that the former revelation was dead, had lost its way, was only of “men,” and stood in need of renewal or to be abandoned completely. Even Eusebius states, they “revile(d) the entire universal Church under heaven.” New spirits must first deconstruct the Church, and the authority given Her by Christ the Lord, and assert that it is somehow faulty and or in darkness. This enables new claims to appear more credible.

 . . .


--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!