Monday, August 5, 2019

Violence Begets Violence


Part of Pres Trump’s statement regarding the shootings in El Paso and Dayton went as follows:



Our hearts are shattered for every family whose parents, children, husbands, and wives were ripped from their arms and their lives. America weeps for the fallen. We are a loving nation, and our children are entitled to grow up in a just, peaceful, and loving society. Together, we lock arms to shoulder the grief, we ask God in Heaven to ease the anguish of those who suffer, and we vow to act with urgent resolve.


These are some high-sounding words, but they are very hypocritical in light of Pres Trump’s foreign policy.  Because of it, how many tens of thousands of men, women, and, yes, children have suffered hunger, chemical burns, and death in Yemen, Syria, Venezuela, Iran, and elsewhere?




And yet there are never any calls from the President to ‘weep for’ these ‘fallen’, to ‘lock arms to shoulder’ their ‘grief’.  There is no ‘outrage’ for these ‘barbaric slaughters’.

Pres Trump went on to blame hatred for one of the shootings:



This is quite true, but again he undermines his own argument.  While all loss of life is tragic, the ideology of Americanism is fueling far more violence around the world than white supremacy.  Why is it permissible to offer the blood sacrifice of thousands of lives on the altar of not just American exceptionalism but American supremacism?  Those also are ‘sinister ideologies’ which ‘must be defeated’ if there is to be a reduction in violence in the world.

He said further,



--Ibid.

Here again, if he really believes this, why is the [u.] S. military under his command glorifying violent video games and turning military service itself into a video game?





Pres Trump closed with these remarks:



We should pray for God’s blessings for the departed and for the survivors, but we should not pray for God’s blessing on the world-scourge of America.  It needs to break apart.  The more people try to hold it together, the more the internal cultural differences and stresses will cause violence to increase.  The only way to keep the fake construct of America ‘united’ will be a totalitarian government, and we are well on our way there.  The better course is to allow each cultural region and/or each State to go her own way.

The larger point, however, is that the peoples of the States are turning a blind eye to the violence their own armed forces are inflicting on innocent people around the world.  Abraham Hamilton on American Family Radio makes the link between abortion and the culture of violence.  Fine.  We agree.  But he and others like him need to go further and make the connection between Washington City’s endless wars abroad and the culture of violence this encourages back home as well.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!

Friday, August 2, 2019

Protestants vs Church History

Bryan Fischer, an outspoken Evangelical Protestant, today (2 August 2019) claimed on his radio program Focal Point that there were no dedicated church buildings before St Constantine the Great ascended the imperial throne of Rome.  However, if one reads a little Church history, he will see this is false.  Eusebius writes the following about the time of the Emperor Diocletian, prior to St Constantine:

5. And one could see the rulers in every church accorded the greatest favor by all officers and governors. But how can any one describe those vast assemblies, and the multitude that crowded together in every city, and the famous gatherings in the houses of prayer; on whose account not being satisfied with the ancient buildings they erected from the foundation large churches in all the cities?

--Church History, Book VIII, Ch. 1

4. It was in the nineteenth year of the reign of Diocletian, in the month Dystrus, called March by the Romans, when the feast of the Saviour's passion was near at hand, that royal edicts were published everywhere, commanding that the churches be leveled to the ground and the Scriptures be destroyed by fire, and ordering that those who held places of honor be degraded, and that the household servants, if they persisted in the profession of Christianity, be deprived of freedom.

--Ibid., Ch. 2


There certainly were dedicated church buildings prior to St Constantine.  However, this error on the part of Mr Fischer is understandable because of Protestant revisionism with respect to Church history.  Their version of it is given by Fr Zechariah Lynch, himself a former Pentecostal who is now an Orthodox priest:

 . . . between the year 311AD and 1300AD is simply the word “Darkness” (from 33AD to 311AD the church was said to be operating in its original “power”). That is, the Church went into a time of captivity and darkness.
1300AD is labeled “Refreshing Starts,” during this period such figures as John Huss, John Wycliffe, and others are considered the pioneers of refreshment.
1500AD – “Grace,” clearly this refers to what is known as the Protestant Reformation.
1700AD – “Personal holiness and conversion.”
1800AD – “Prayer and Evangelism.”
1900AD – “Baptism of the Holy Spirit.”
1950AD – “Charismatic.”
Late 1900’s – “Combine them all!” The note below the diagram reads, “God is building, adding and adding, God is restoring His Church!” And with a note of surprised delight its comments, “In the 1950s and after charismatic gifts began to flow even in traditional churches.”


Such a scheme distorts one’s view of actual Church history, as it likely has in the case of Mr Fischer.  Perhaps, though, this oversight of his vis-à-vis church buildings will help him and other Protestant Evangelicals to consider where else they have gone astray with respect to the truth about the Orthodox Church and those who claim to be the Body of Christ.

--

Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!

Anathema to the Union!