It is a
great irony that those who are most strident that they ‘follow the science’
regarding the protection from COVID provided by face masks, social distancing,
etc., seem just as likely to be driven to acts of senseless violence against
those who reject their views as the Crusaders and Inquisitors of the
post-Schism West whom they love to condemn for their barbaric religious
fanaticism (and
they were unnecessarily brutal; this is not meant as a defense of the latter’s
actions):
https://www.britannica.com/event/Albigensian-Crusade
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Bridgeport-man-charged-with-beating-74-year-old-15845300.php
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-mask-subway-slurs-beating-hate-crime-20201224-7p543s4mozdhpnoremzsbommhe-story.html
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/video/officer-tases-arrests-woman-wearing-mask-football-game-73237382
https://www.timesofisrael.com/man-says-he-was-beaten-by-police-and-jailed-for-four-days-for-not-wearing-mask/
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/world-news/20201015/cops-beat-man-death-not-wearing-mask
The COVID
scientism warriors are thus no more rational than the clerics
and soldiers of the Middle Ages they decry. Indeed, they
are driving us towards a remarkably similar society in some ways. Consider how closely the methods of the
Inquisition resemble various proposals for COVID quarantine centers and such
like:
After
consulting with canon lawyers, the inquisitor would sentence those found guilty
at a sermo generalis,
or public homily. Judicial penances were imposed on those who had been
convicted of heresy and had recanted. The most common punishments were
penitential pilgrimages, the wearing of yellow crosses on clothing (which was
feared because it led to ostracism), and imprisonment.
The inquisition employed two kinds of
prisons, both staffed by laymen. One type was the murus largus, or open prison, which consisted of cells
built around a courtyard in which the inmates enjoyed considerable freedom. The
other type was the murus strictus, a
high-security prison, where inmates were kept in solitary confinement, often in
chains. Heretics who admitted their errors but refused to recant were handed
over to the secular authorities and burned at the stake. There were usually not
many cases of this kind, because the chief aim of the inquisitors was to reconcile heretics to the church.
On rare occasions, however, large public executions did take place, as at
Verona in 1278, when some 200 Cathars were burned.
--Edward Peters, https://www.britannica.com/topic/inquisition/Early-modern-Europe
Just as with
the old Inquisition, for those guilty of the new ‘heresy’ of denying
conventional COVID ‘truths’, they are to be throw into prison camps of one sort
or another, or marked (with a smartphone app that they are
‘unclean’/unvaccinated/etc.), or, as above, abused physically in some way:
https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/GOP-continues-to-draw-attention-to-long-dormant-15844562.php
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-australia/australian-state-considers-mining-camps-for-coronavirus-quarantine-idUSKBN29J0DT
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/20/asia/china-shijiazhuang-covid-quarantine-intl-hnk-scli/index.html
Fr Stephen
Freeman has recently written about the elevation of strong personal feelings to
the level of a religion (bolding added):
On a daily basis, I have become
increasingly aware of the “religious” nature of almost the whole of modern
life. That might seem to be an odd observation when the culture in which we
live largely describes itself as “secular.” That designation, however, only has
meaning in saying that the culture does not give allegiance or preference to
any particular, organized religious body. It is sadly the case, however, that
this self-conception makes the culture particularly blind to just how
“religious” it is in almost everything it does. I suspect that the more removed
we are from true communion with God, the more
“religious” we become. It is, I think, an idolatrous substitute for true
existence, and a misguided attempt to impose an order and meaning that we
ourselves create. Our social life thus becomes dominated by our continual
efforts to convince (or compel) others (or to convince ourselves) to accept a
worldview and way of life that has no true existence apart from our own efforts
to make it so.
--https://www.pravmir.com/the-religious-nature-of-modern-life/
‘A misguided
attempt to impose an order and meaning that we ourselves create’: It would be hard to find better words to
describe what the COVID scientism warriors are trying to force upon those who
disagree with them.
--
Holy Ælfred
the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to
the Union!
