The Freedom Caucuses are amongst the better
things happening in State politics today.
Louisiana is blessed to have one, and they have done some good work so
far. Much of the legislation they have
written and passed has been excellent, but we cannot say the same thing for
some of the resolutions they have written.
The Louisiana Freedom Caucus’s (LFC) condemnation of London (England)
Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley is a case-in-point. It fails rhetorically and strategically.
Sir Mark has
threatened
to extradite anyone in the US who shares footage on social media of the
immigration riots that have plagued England recently that he deems
forbidden. The LFC rightly objected and
issued a
stern reply to Sir Mark. But the
rhetorical form they chose doesn’t fit the situation at all. They used a device suited for a cold,
dispassionate legal brief (a repetitious list of ‘Whereas’ statements), not for
bidding fiery defiance to a would-be tyrant.
Examples:
WHEREAS on the 4th of July,
1776, the 13 British Colonies declared independence from England . . .
WHEREAS in 1787, the colonies adopted
a Constitution . . .
WHEREAS given the fact that English laws
related to the infringement of free speech have no effect in the United States
. . .
This is the
sort of thing that makes peoples’ eyes glaze over, rather than rise up in
indignation against the oppressor and in solidarity with the oppressed.
A better
example of rhetoric against a tyrant comes from a martyr celebrated on 14
August, St.
Eusebius of Palestine (martyred near the end of the 3rd
century). Here is some of the dialogue
between him and the Roman judge:
Maxentius, whom the people stirred up by
furious clamours against the servant of Christ, said to him: “Sacrifice to the
gods freely, or you shall be made to do it against your will.” The martyr
replied: “There is a greater law which says, Thou shalt adore the Lord
thy God, and him alone shalt thou serve.”
Maxentius urged: “Choose either to offer
sacrifice, or to suffer the most rigorous torments.” Eusebius answered: “It is
not consistent with reason for a person to adore stones, than which nothing is
viler or more brittle.”
MAXENTIUS: “These Christians are a
hardened race of men, to whom it seems desirable rather to die than to live.”
EUSEBIUS: “It is impious to despise the light for the sake of darkness.”
Had St.
Eusebius answered as the LFC did – ‘Whereas there is a greater law…; Whereas it
is not consistent with reason…; Whereas it is impious…; and so forth – such statements
would not have been nearly as effective as the brief, direct responses he
actually gave. We hope the LFC will keep
things like this in mind in their future resolutions.
Rhetoric
aside, there is also the problem of strategy.
In condemning Comm. Rowley, the LFC took too big of a swing and landed
some blows on the English people at large with lines like these:
WHEREAS the rights of Americans have been
inviolate since that time, though we readily acknowledge England’s failed
attempt to retake the colonies, we respectfully remind the Commissioner how
that fracas ended---with an enormous defeat of England’s Army at the Battle of
New Orleans. English casualties were high and the Royal Army was sent
home without the treasure or property it craved; . . .
If the LFC
really wants to make Sir Mark uncomfortable, they need to undermine his
position of strength in England. That is
done by making common cause with the plainfolk of England, the people he is
threatening just like Louisianans and other Southerners and the rest of the States
with jail time for sharing videos on social media. However, one does not make allies by mocking
the history and valor of those English people, saying in effect ‘We kicked yo’
hineys once, and we’re ready to do it again.’
The LFC
ought to say instead that they understand and value the deep cultural ties Louisiana
and all the other States share with the English people. . . .
The rest is
at https://identitydixie.com/2024/08/19/rebuking-rowley/.
--
Holy Ælfred the Great, King of England, South Patron, pray for us
sinners at the Souð, unworthy though we are!
Anathema to the Union!
No comments:
Post a Comment